Forum Moderators: Robert Charlton & goodroi
same script i used a few months back focused on different terms and was doing really well. the site has only been live about 6 weeks but last time this was sufficient time to be getting reasonable results.
any ideas? penalty or delayed action for fast generated content of new sites?
site is not deceiving and provides exactly what it says - pics, videos and questions and answers on the topic.
is use of some api's now downgraded in results?
any ideas of a fix?
i'll try rewriting the script to scrape the content instead of rss and hide the api's better and re-arange the text.
its a shame because the site offers what it says and was never a problem before.
Google appears hesitant to allocate trust to site's that fast link , and pump out pages with strings of common characters in the body content. API content will be seen easily .
Top marks in the algo will go to unique content , that is linked to from a very few trusted sources at the outset. Build on that with fresh , 100% unique content and the odd link from time to time.
Anything else can be very slow to get started in my experience as it forms a relatively low priority to G.