Forum Moderators: Robert Charlton & goodroi
Reading this forum I'm keeping finding out that almost every move I made with my webisite was incorrect from SEO perspective:
1. Generated too many incoming links in very short time. Although those links were not paid the rate with which they were acquired is out of normal for such a site.
2. Chose incorrect internal linking structure and had to 301 later.
3. Allowed too much duplicated content.
4. Over-optimised.
5. Didn't add any additional value to the site.
All my mistakes above led to my site being put into sandbox then some filter/penalty applied to it.
Is this possible to go back to SERPs or this site is dead forever?
I would you very grateful you have any similar experience you can share information about.
Thank you.
So I'd say that errors on the level you're talking about CAN be fixed and eventually you can rank with a re-vamped site on the same domain, same owner.
Only your first point "too many incoming links in very short time" is cause for some concern. So back out of whatever you can back out of. When you are ready on all fronts, use your Webmaster Tools account for a reconsideration request and be sure to mention what you did and what you did to back out of it.
This worries me too, but I'm not sure I can backup... It was normal submission, no black schemes, some of my competitors made the same and they rank well. The only thing I'm not sure is how fast they acquired their links (you can submit in one go, but can make 10 submisions a day).
Considering this was white hat method and that there are links from most reputable websites in my niche, is this possible without removing those links to get this filter/penalty lifted by reconsideration request? It's been about 8 months already since then.
If you build a better backlink profile, your rankings can improve. You can always apologize and claim newbie ignorance in your reconsideration request - at least one time ;) Follow the discussions in our Link Develoopment forum for ideas.
potentialgeek, yes, you are right, I would like to start one more website from stratch trying to avoid all mistakes I made before.
[edited by: tedster at 7:50 pm (utc) on Jan. 13, 2009]