Will Google Ban Content from "Rewriting Software"?

[dineshbabu179]

Suppose consider i am having a blog.

Will the Blog With Unique content Get Banned...

The Unique content are Generated by Rewriting software. When this software generate content. The Content looks like more rubbish... Some what we can understand 50%..

Will Google Look for Such Thing " Grammar" " good English" and other factors to ban this Blog

. Is the Google system will read our article and check it whether it is readable or not ?

[Pico_Train]

What you are talking about is spam. Spam is crap. Don't come here asking for help to spam. You are a spammer. Get lost.

[tedster]

That's pretty harsh, Pico. If this was a spammer, then he would already know the answer to that question.

And the answer is that whether by algorithm or by human review, Google does catch this kind of thing and throw it away -- and often bans the domain name as well as using it to find any related domains.

I certainly agree with Pico's assessment. The web does not need more spam, and you would be much better off to create a real business rather than trying to cut corners. When you do a search, do you want to land on a page of auto-generated text that you can't even read?

[wheel]

>>>When you do a search, do you want to land on a page of auto-generated text that you can't even read?

Well, if the autogenerated content is just SE fodder and the actual 'content' for the visitor is something else like ads or affiliate type stuff, and the visitor finds what they want elsewhere on the page, then it's not spam, it's a valid marketing technique of use to visitors.

Hey, don't shoot me man, I'm just sayin' :).

In any event, work or not, you clearly realize there's a risk there. And you're increasing your risk by using what looks to be off the shelf software. That leaves you exposed to the risk of footprints. If I was going to auto generate content, I'd be doing so from a custom program, not something every other entry level spammer in the world is using.

I think ultimately the only way you're going to find out is to try it. Again, with the risk, when you first start trying this kind of stuff make sure you're firewalled from anyone being able to find out your association with this site, or association of this site with any of your other sites.

[wheel]

Plus, if you really want autogenerated content that you can't read all you have to do is find some offshore writers at $3 an article. Unless you're doing 100's of sites all at once that's probably the cheaper and better route anyway.

[tedster]

The issue that applies to this forum is whether Google can detect auto-generated "nonsense" text. From what I see, the closer content gets to grammatical text the harder it has been for Google to detect. One of the key techniques they developed recently to detect even grammatical auto-gen pages is phrase-based indexing for spam detection [appft1.uspto.gov].

While I strongly suspect the methods described in that patent are also used to detect "over-optimization", they are definitely used to detect autogenerated text, as well as scraped snippet pages. The "term co-occurence" profiles for both tends to be well outside statistical norms.

Some of what still gets past Google's automated checks still tends to get banned because of other tell-tale footprints - including the backlink networks, template commonalities, and the human QA workers who inspect the most valuable SERPs manually.

[dineshbabu179]

Thanks for other Guys.

@Pico_Train

"What you are talking about is spam. Spam is crap. Don't come here asking for help to spam. You are a spammer. Get lost."

I know you are So Brilliant webmasters, You are telling me that i am slammer. How do you Detect me i am a spammer.

Asking Question is a Spam for you. if it so all the questions are spam. Then why you are roaming here...

Pico first of all you should to know.. How to talk to others. an then come to forum to an share your Views..

[tedster]

dineshbabu, autogenrated content IS spam - that's what we're trying to tell you. It is not valuable for the end user, it is against Google's guidelines and it is done only to rank, and not to help visitors at all.

I believe you thought you were trying something helpful to boost your rankings but you didn't know all of this. Now you do.

You are playing with a spamming tool - and since it puts out 50% gibberish by your own admission, it's not even a very good spamming tool.

[Pico_Train]

Like I said your question wasn't spam, what you want to do is spam. I am sharing my views and I stand by what I said.

Find something more interesting to your users than auto generated crap.

[dineshbabu179]

K guys.. Thanks for all your Replies..

[johnnie]

I agree with Pico. I spend a lot of time creating content that is valuable to my visitors. That, together with some linkbuilding and some clever keyword use, is my SEO. Now a guy comes in and wants to compete using some spam-generator spening 2 seconds an article? Sorry, but he's not getting my cookie. Why should anybody want to help someone who's bound on polluting the web.

[dineshbabu179]

i red in one of the forum. Where creating some 10 to 20 blogs.. and having link from that to your site.. I Know.. its really bad... Just bring that issue to your view.

[wheel]

That, together with some linkbuilding and some clever keyword use, is my SEO.

A less black and white approach might be considered. There's a lot of people who would describe what you do as spam just as fervently as you feel about auto generated content.

[Pico_Train]

10 to 20 new gibberish blogs is just what the web needs.

[tedster]

I think the community has weighed in on the topic - and the opening question is answered. So I'm locking the thread.