Forum Moderators: Robert Charlton & goodroi

Message Too Old, No Replies

1st Position in Yahoo But Nowhere on Google

         

Ricky123

10:16 am on Nov 24, 2008 (gmt 0)

10+ Year Member



Hi all

I rank #1 in Yahoo for one of my core keywords for the website and yet I am no where in it for Google!. Why?

Anybody have any ideas?

[edited by: Ricky123 at 10:24 am (utc) on Nov. 24, 2008]

[edited by: engine at 12:03 pm (utc) on Nov. 24, 2008]
[edit reason] No specific sites or keywords, thanks [/edit]

tedster

6:44 pm on Nov 24, 2008 (gmt 0)

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member



Hello Ricky, and welcome to the forums.

When you say "nowhere", do you mean literally not on any of the search results pages? in other words, have you checked all the way to the end?

Google has a penalty for "over-optimization" that may be affecting you. We've been calling it the -950 pnealty [webmasterworld.com] because it can sometimes throw your url to the very end of the results.

Ricky123

3:51 am on Nov 25, 2008 (gmt 0)

10+ Year Member



Thanks for reply
But we are ranking for other keywords in google then how can we decide it is Google's 950 Penalty

[edited by: Ricky123 at 3:53 am (utc) on Nov. 25, 2008]

tedster

5:36 am on Nov 25, 2008 (gmt 0)

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member



That penalty can be applied to just one keyword - or one page - or an entire website.

Ricky123

5:49 am on Nov 25, 2008 (gmt 0)

10+ Year Member



ohh my god then How to Fix the Google 950 Penalty

[edited by: Ricky123 at 5:49 am (utc) on Nov. 25, 2008]

tedster

8:02 am on Nov 25, 2008 (gmt 0)

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member



Follow up and read all the discussion here - the main threads link from that summary thread above. I know it's a lot to absorb, but it has been under discussion for nearly two years at this point and it can be a tough one.

The summary way to say it is you've used enough specific SEO advice that you created too many relevance signals - you made your url too "Google perfect" for the search term. The first place I check is anchor text - especially text menus where it can be way too easy to repeat the same keyword in many links.

If that's apparently not the problem, then have you loaded the page in other ways - especially using the keyword in too many ways (see the summary thread), or using too many synonmyms or somewhat related words. The kind of thing that Information Retrieval calls "co-occurence".

I also have a suspicion that if you over-control the anchor text in backlinks from other sites, this can trigger the -950 effect.

What Google is doing here is not easy to wrap your head around, especially at first. It's a kind of semantic algo that is quite different from the very literal and linear approach that old time algos used.

internetheaven

11:44 am on Nov 25, 2008 (gmt 0)

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member



The title of this thread made me smile ... a bit of nostalgia really! It's rare to see really, really new SEOs on these boards asking the same questions we asked (what feels like many, many) years ago.

Very brave to enter the arena now unless you're 99% niche. Best of luck!