Forum Moderators: Robert Charlton & goodroi
Has anyone noticed on some queries when "Pages from UK" is selected, that pages that are not from the UK are returned?
In one instance wikipedia shows up in the "Pages from UK" results. I've stumbled across this with a couple of queries.
[edited by: tedster at 2:28 pm (utc) on Aug. 1, 2008]
Could this be because Wikipedia has enough inbound links from the UK that those suffice to include it in UK results?
No, I am seeing .com.au URLs in "Pages from UK" and .co.uk URLs in "Pages from Australia".
Something is definitely wrong, which isn't surprising since Google has had so many geo-targeting issues in the past.
4 com.au sites in "pages from the UK" [google.co.uk]
8 co.uk sites in "pages from Australia" [google.com.au]
I think a number of Wikipedia servers are physically in the UK, incidentally.
[edited by: Receptional_Andy at 10:07 am (utc) on July 31, 2008]
I currently see only a tiny percentage of mismatched sites:
Thing is, none of the mismatched sites are listed in either of the searches, plus most of the .co.uk in google.com.au are Australian sites.
What I have found regarding the mismatches:
- only apply to certain queries, eg "purple widgets" may returned mismatched results, but "2 purple widgets" are fine.
- apply to all regional Googles. eg - searches on google.ca return .com.au and .co.uk results.
- low traffic searches so far.
I'm betting it's just another geo-targeting bug.
Which has returned for my Seattle server and it's now decided all these UK registered .coms are back in South Africa...again! It's been like this all year back and forth, crazy.
Apparently fixing the "from country" results is not currently a high priority at Google. Seems like almost anything, including requiring a UK tld, would be better than this kind of error. Yes, the problem is complex, with some hosts using IP blocks outside the "real" country and so on - but that doesn't explain this extended problem.
I have written before about its yo-yoing, ins-and-outs etc and Google creating a duplicate site with exampleexample.com rather than the always used example-example.com.
I decided a while back to go through every site link and hard code everything as example-example.com since the site could not even be found for comany name + region. All this was eventually sorted out earlier this week.
In the last couple of days I have noticed this for keyword1 keyword2 region:
1. Using Google.com - nothing
2. Using Google.com UK version - #1
3. Using Google.co.uk - #1
4. Using Google.co.uk - pages from the UK - #1
Now to wait and see as all the new coding etc works its way through the cached pages.
Fingers crossed but it least its back for the moment for its two most important keywords plus region.
Geo-targetting is screwed-up?
I have HUGE global metrics however I am seeing extremely focussed targetting too. To the ridiculous extreme IMHO.
Tweaks tweaks and more tweaks...better than cuil though:-)
In the next post in this series, I'll talk about some of the experiments we are running, and what we hope to learn from them.
[edited by: tedster at 8:01 am (utc) on Aug. 4, 2008]
[edit reason] fix spelling [/edit]
No, I am seeing .com.au URLs in "Pages from UK" and .co.uk URLs in "Pages from Australia".
Well, they're both under the same crown. ;)
I have checked a few similar queries and found several plain (302) redirects from one to another tld, so I guess in many cases it is geo-cloaking at work.
Also, a few registrant's addresses from the second country and even a contact email address on about us page (tld part).
[edited by: tedster at 3:10 pm (utc) on Aug. 14, 2008]
[edit reason] moved from another location [/edit]