Forum Moderators: Robert Charlton & goodroi

Message Too Old, No Replies

Bold, strong and headings

         

tarr74

1:07 am on Jan 13, 2008 (gmt 0)

10+ Year Member



Hi,
I am redesigning a friend's site. Since it ranks pretty weel, I am not gonna touch the text of his pages, Just the styling through CSS and converting the code in XHTML 1.1.

Well, some of his keywords are between bold tags and I've heard that Google does not give any weigt to bold anymore, so I am considering to tranform those bolds in H3s (yes, they are paragraph titles).

What would you do? Keep the Bold tags or using H3s?

Johan007

10:27 am on Jan 13, 2008 (gmt 0)

10+ Year Member Top Contributors Of The Month



H3 is semantically correct and will provide you with more than SEO benefit. There is no need to convert to XHTML1.1, the current recommendation HTML 4.01 Strict.

Johan007

10:30 am on Jan 13, 2008 (gmt 0)

10+ Year Member Top Contributors Of The Month



oh and XHTML should support <strong> tag instead of <b>.

tarr74

1:58 pm on Jan 13, 2008 (gmt 0)

10+ Year Member



Oh, tahnks: and what about xhtml 1.0?

Robert Charlton

6:17 pm on Jan 13, 2008 (gmt 0)

WebmasterWorld Administrator 10+ Year Member Top Contributors Of The Month



This discussion makes a very strong case for HTML 4.01 instead of XHTML 1.0 for most websites....

Why most of us should NOT use XHTML
[webmasterworld.com...]

tarr74

12:28 am on Jan 14, 2008 (gmt 0)

10+ Year Member



4.01. transitional or strict?

Robert Charlton

12:51 am on Jan 14, 2008 (gmt 0)

WebmasterWorld Administrator 10+ Year Member Top Contributors Of The Month



4.01. transitional or strict?

That seems to depend on other considerations, as discussed in the above-mentioned thread, which is off the topic of Google Search and we don't want to rehash here.

g1smd

12:59 am on Jan 14, 2008 (gmt 0)

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member Top Contributors Of The Month



Yes, use <hx> tags for headings, not bold or strong.

HTML 4.01, either Strict or Transitional, is fine for now.