Dynamic or static pages what google prefers?

[zaneta]

I believed that google prefers the static pages than dynamic, therefore as a text I have created 6 months ago a non commercial site of 300 pages all with unique text all static pages.
raking resutls are not so good

[ecmedia]

You must also focus on creating awareness about your website through other means so that people start to link to you. Only then you will see results - it is too early to see results.

[tedster]

The difference between dynamic urls and static is not a big thing today. Unless the dynamic urls are overly complex, Google spiders them quite well. The added crawling logic might make you spidering cycle just a bit slower, but that's nothing that should be a barrier to ranking well. Make sure there's no duplicate url problems. If you have more than one parameter in the query string, be very certain that only one order of parameter values resolves directly.

Complex urls may not get quite as many click-throughs, and over time this might be a slight ranking deterrent. However, that's a user related metric, and not something inherent in Google. Well crafted titles and meta descriptions can usually compensate for that minor factor.

Here's the big picture: even with dynamic urls, a site's pages can rank extremely well and pull in great Google traffic.