Forum Moderators: Robert Charlton & goodroi
If all other SEO factors are equal would Google prefer a .com over its twin .info site? I'm ignoring the issue of dup content for the purposes of this question.
All opinions appreciated
JB
However, since there are age and historical factors in the algo, sites with a .com would probably average out as longer established. Also, businesses with a long term game plan for the web usually prefer a .com domain, rather than a .info. Those two factors alone probably account for the sight of so many highly ranked .com domains and so many fewer well-ranked .info domains.
tedster
I appreciate the age factor. Just recently I've seen a couple of sites for sale that had .info tlds and I have always shied (sp?) away from buying .info sites preferring the .com tld. I just wanted to make sure that by buying myself a .info site I wasn't picking up an automatic ranking penalty for the .tld alone.
new_seo
Yeah, it was a hypothetical question!
Thanks again guys
...I have always shied (sp?) away from buying .info sites preferring the .com tld. I just wanted to make sure that by buying myself a .info site I wasn't picking up an automatic ranking penalty for the .tld alone.
Dot coms have some advantages with regard to browser defaults and some user expectations.
For a discussion of the pros and cons of .info domains apart from ranking questions, see this excellent discussion....
Who would buy or build a website on a .info domain these days?
Do .info domains have a bad reputation? Can a .info website become popular?
[webmasterworld.com...]