Forum Moderators: Robert Charlton & goodroi
The argument was that Google treats both as spaces (and completely ignores the "underscore" character). The logic was sound, and I would like to use dots in URLs on a new site. But although I agree with the logic, I can see no evidence in G that using dots actually works. The only dots I see, in the URLs of ranked pages, are always immediately followed by "html" ;-)
Can anyone confirm whether googlebot actually indexes pages with dots in the URL - or does it just get confused?
Example. I propose to use URL structure similar to www.mysite.com/keyword1.keyword2-keyword3.html instead of using www.mysite.com/keyword1-keyword2-keyword3.html
Thanks.
The thread you want is: [webmasterworld.com...]
[edited by: tedster at 4:24 am (utc) on May 2, 2006]
[edit reason] make link live [/edit]
I'm still a hyphen kind of guy -- I prefer dedicating the "dot" to it's more common purposes in the domain name and the file extension.
Answer: they aren't.
.
Extra bonus: URL then contains only slash (/) and dot (.) punctuation and becomes much easier to say out loud too. With no dashes (-), there is no confusion between dash (-) and slash (/) any more.