Welcome to WebmasterWorld Guest from 18.104.22.168
Does Google gives weightage to keywords in domain name?
General perception is yes, expert opinion is yes (Is there a no?).
I think search engines (esp Google, as they are the smartest so far) should not use (if they are using) keywords in domain name as a positive ranking factor. Here is my opinion on why so?
Does searchengine.com serves better than google.com as a search engine? I can think of 100s of brands without any keyphrases in their name. So if searchengine.com is getting additional 2 points for using the keyphrase in domain name then it is equivalent of removing 2 points from google.com for not using the keyphrase in their domain name. I do not think its a good equation. In other words, Is a person named "footballplayer", a better football player?
My whole point is, when domain names have nothing to do with services then why to consider it. I keep advising people not to look at SEs (please for God sake) while choosing domain names. Only think of 3 things,
IMO Google should do a favor to web world by letting the world know, "DOMAIN NAME does't MATTER for GOOGLE RANKING". What is your opinion?
(My weekend post, have a nice weekend)
I have a site that has a name that is pretty much unrelated to the content and it dominates it's sector.
Do you have evidence that they are giving the name any weight at all currently?
To me, it does look like keywords in domain names are a powerfull signal to the SE of the intent of the web site
An obvious example
Long may it continue
If Google does give any weight to the domain name, it probably isn't much, and it's likely to be in context with other things. For example, a site named widgetville-hog-callers.com might get a little boost for the keyphrase "hog callers" if had a lot of links from pages about hog calling on high-"TrustRank" sites. And why not, if the domain name and other factors suggested that the site was a useful resource for "hog callers" or "hog callers in widgetville"?
The domain name is certainly one place to look - but with a solid dose of critical doublechecking and lot of other algo factors needing to be lined up. The algos that Google uses today are a lot more sophisticated than the text-string-match approach of the 1990's, adding up one point for this and two points for that.
Easily brandable. You want "google.com" and not "mykeyword.com". Keyword domains are out - branding and name recognition are in - big time in. The value of keywords in a domain name have never been less to se's. Learn the lesson of "goto.com" becomes "Overture.com" and why they did it. It's one of the most powerful gut check calls I've ever seen on the internet. That took serious resolve and nerve to blow away several years of branding. (that is a whole 'nother article, but learn the lesson as it applies to all of us).
The thing is I find this just as valid today. If your establishing a brand fair enough its completely valid that your domain should come out top based on the site domain name, but I don't think a search query such as "bluewidgits" should give any value to the keyword in domain name at all. I quoted Brett because I thought he was correct back then and still correct today. I would like to know if this opinion has shifted.
I'm in the widget programming field. I've been battling over the years with one website in particular that is widgetprogramming.com I beat him in all searchs other than widget programming, even though that is all my site is about. There is also another website that I have a hard time getting above - widgetconsulting.com
Could it be that those sites simply rank higher based on other factors? Sure, but I think it is the domain name.
ps. my website is a short version of my company name. Too bad I didn't pick Widget Programming, inc. back in 2000.
Still I think back to the florida update where google boosted non commercial sites and I think this is a temporary boost to keyword in domain (and again non commercial have been boosted) whilst people work through there supplemental results.
I don't think a search query such as "bluewidgits" should give any value to the keyword in domain name at all. I quoted Brett because I thought he was correct back then and still correct today. I would like to know if this opinion has shifted
Maybe it's less about whether the keyword is in the domain name than whether the keyword is in the URL. Either way, the keyword [in the domain or the URL] is just one factor that Google can use in calculating whether the page is relevant for widgets, whatsits, or Honolulu hotties.
As for whether one should select a keyword when creating a brand, that depends. "Bank of America" has two keywords (one related to its business), but "Wells Fargo" doesn't. It's unlikely that traffic to either company's Web site is significantly affected by whether the first word in the name is "bank" or "wells," or that the name ends in "America" or "Fargo." What probably does matter, over the long term, is whether the brand name sounds legitimate and inspires trust. "Keyword1-keyword2-keyword3-keyword4.com" always reminds me of those Yellow Pages ads for businesses with names like "AAAA-Acme Driving School."
The benefit from inbound links seems pretty clear. In my example all inbound links to my MauveWidgets.com domain will be using the main keywords on the link. This is the main reason why an industry has been created around trading domain names.
Will/Should Google remove Domain Name weight from Algo?
No. Why? Because it is one of those factors that is "almost" a given. The Domain (www.example.com) is the first thing at the top of the list (as an example). From there, you work downwards. Okay, the domain matches, now, let's look at the other factors such as title, meta description, <h> elements, main content, internal anchor text, etc.
A keyword domain in itself is just that, a keyword domain. It is up to the owner (and/or their assigns) to make it perform as it should. With a keyword domain, you have a +1 point out of the box. ;)
P.S. This is probably one of the more frequent discussions here at WebmasterWorld and has been for as long as I can remember...
[edited by: pageoneresults at 1:36 pm (utc) on May 13, 2007]
For example searching for "Atlanta Widget shops" and the engine returns as number one atlantawidgetshop.com which doesn't have what the searcher is looking for [at that point] the searcher is likely to think "darn owner trying to trick Google"
If number one is AjiNIMCsupergetitherebrand.com and it doesn't have what the searcher is looking for the searcher wonders what on earth Google is doing returning a spammed site like that and wonders if it would be better to look in Yahoo instead.
Searchers are likely to look more kindly on a spammed keyword domain than a spammed branded domain from the engines perspective.
That's open to debate, but in any case, mightn't a "spammed keyword domain" increase the likelihood of an "overoptimization penalty" of the kind that have been discussed many times? And isn't a keyword-targeted domain name like "keyword1-keyword2-keyword3.com" more likely to turn off SERP users than a more legitimate-sounding domain would?
I guess a lot depends on what you're trying to achieve. Are you just trying to make hay while the sun shines (and relying solely on organic search referrals with 100% churn) or are you trying to build a business for the long term?
And isn't a keyword-targeted domain name like "keyword1-keyword2-keyword3.com" more likely to turn off SERP users than a more legitimate-sounding domain would?
Most probably, but with a keyword domain the searcher can make that decision without clicking the SERP entry, with a branded domain the searcher needs to actually visit the site to find out it isn't what he is looking for.
But with a keyword domain the searcher can make that decision without clicking the SERP entry.
Ah, but there will be other determining factors that weigh in before the URI. Your average surfer is probably not looking at that URI as closely as you and I might. What they are looking at are the titles and snippets along with their search term being bolded. Granted, a lit up URI (bolded) is surely a visual clue. But, there are other more important elements the searcher sees before that. ;)
Keyword stuffed domains are sometimes made for niche information (sometimes really great). I know few sites that are dedicated for a particular topic and the domain name reflects it too.
[edited by: tedster at 5:39 pm (utc) on May 13, 2007]
If all other key issues lined up, I'd boost the domain's value for SERPs *after* all those key things lined up.
Is it a fluke that the number one SERP for the first word of this site's dn is a clean generic .com?
Suspect two words in a clean .com could be valued by Google for exact phrase searches.
There should be a big drop off in SERP value from the perfect single-word .com to other dns, if G is going to put any value into them.
I see a lot more MFA sites and other spam sites using nasty multi-keyword creations than clean one- or two-word dns. G's trust algo could see red flags in those wild things but not in the perfect dns. Not too many spammers can afford great domains.