Forum Moderators: Robert Charlton & goodroi
"I think some of us are seeing a different variation. I know my site and at least someone else on this thread ranks # 1 if you type in their domain name. Or domain.com. Back actual pages by title, those that used to be in the top 10 SERPS are now about 10 pages back, in the 100+ range. "
This is exactly what I'm seeing. I'm holding many keywords fine but all my big keywords are gone most of the time.
Our site is swinging up and down all day long. Sometimes I search for red widget and we are not on page 1 but we are in the top 4 pages then a search an hour later and we are blasted back to the bottom of the results.
Other keywords seem stuck at the bottom.
As a result our Google traffic is down more than 80%.
We have lost many keywords that we have held #1 on for years. How can we go from #1 to the bottom or not even showing over night?
I have done nothing to deserve this and cant seem to figure out why this happened.
[edited by: tedster at 7:17 pm (utc) on Mar. 2, 2007]
Re-start an Adwords campaign if you want some G love... NO MORE FREE TRAFFIC FOR YOU.
We've never gotten a positive ROI from adwords. too much click fraud in my opinion, but when I complain or ask them to look at it .. just the same old response. "we have reviewed your concern and no fraud has been found". Yea right.
I think Google is simply doing some more testing & house cleaning.
I watched my #1 and #2 competitor sites both disappear for about 48 hours each, then pop right back. This morning, it's my turn in the barrel and my site is gone for my major keyword searches. My sub pages are still there, but the main page, gone.
However, checking C-block datacenters, I am still #1, so I'm sure it's just a temp shake down.
IMHO, it seems Goggle sequentially removes the top few listings, then waits a day or two, checks for duplicate content in remaining pages OR cross linked domains, then flags any violating sub pages and then replaces the main page. That's what it looks like to me, and if so, it's probably a GOOD thing.
My message to the junk sites and black hatters that rank high: "Enjoy it while it lasts, because it never lasts".
I havn't made any major or even any minor changes to the site.
I'll just wait it out and see what happens. What a nightmare!
we will randomize the SERPs until no decent webmaster is left standing.
Actually, I think the serps are more randomized these days. I'm seeing many more sites that probably aren't high trust rank in the serps. For many categories rankings for related keywords are spread out among a wider group of sites than they have been in the past.
I have this strange feeling that we all will be back to normal when this is finished
Is Google now GEO on their results?
My home is just outside of Boston and my job is in Boston. This is happening for a bunch of other terms that are state related
Dave
All you can hope is that G are scanning the forums looking for feedback on the change and realise that many normal unique content sites have been hit. Sadly it seems to take a month to fix anything, but don;t give up on creating good pages and content just because of this, if you say "i might as well give up" you just sound like a spammer who has been caught out.
Keep the faith good unique content always wins through.
Yes, Google is increasingly customizing search results, using many factors. The biggest one is Personalized Search results (seen when your computer is logged in to Google in some way.) But there's also geolocation, and sometimes even different browsers on the same machine.
Google also maintains scores of data centers worldwide that do not contain identical data, and you can be routed to a different data center at any time, even within a second or two.
I have been wondering how many of the current anomalies in search results are tied to all this -- especially the Personalized Search infrastructure, which seems to be under intensive development (and marketing) right now.
With each set of results they monitor, then add/drop a few sites and see what set ultimately produces the most stickiness (I hate that word...)?
Some of the sites/pages may be ones that are tripping filters and by popping them in and out at various times can compare them to sites that appear "clean"? If there's a strong variance between the flagged site and non-flagged sites perhaps that would help lead to the EOR penalty...
It is a real one, all content is unique. I invested hundreds of hours developing this one.
This doesn't sound like a real blog but rather a commercial endeavor. You don't "invest" hours in "developing" a real blog. You just blog, and the links come.
I think that Google is getting better at identifying real blogs which pick up natural links from SEO exercises masquerading as blogs.
This doesn't sound like a real blog but rather a commercial endeavor. You don't "invest" hours in "developing" a real blog. You just blog, and the links come.
[edited by: notme at 12:34 am (utc) on Mar. 9, 2007]
There's nothing you can do to make them happen for very long. So the fix is simple. Stop worrying about Google. Buy some google ads (because this is what they want that's why they move you up and down the results, so you have to buy in.)
Work on other engines to improve ranking...Looking into shopping portals and anything possible to get your name out there.
The days of dominance on Google no longer exists. Its now just King of the Hill for a Day!
Work on other engines to improve ranking...Looking into shopping portals and anything possible to get your name out there.
Surely, but I don't think you can work effectively on more than two servers, after that work gets sloppy quality decreases ..
Diversity has to be in an offline business. You will get mad between sandbox, affiliate killing and an update a day while Google tries to pull content for free, like out of copyright books.
The only content that makes sense is now videos as the bigger publishers are now forcing Google to obey the law and take off all the stolen content, they didn't bat an eyelid to show.
Luckily 1937 camcorders weren't that good although I guess we can expect Google Pathe soon.
I was stunned to see so many people posting about disappearing sites or sites that suddenly and drastically lost their ranking. After searching through over 300 pages and looking at many of these "disappearing" websites it started to become clear that many of them had much in common.
1. Have been on-line for several years or longer, well established sites.
2. Ranked high for many site-related keywords and now their pages cannot be found or they rank in the hundreds of pages.
3. Haven't made any recent, major changes to their sites
4. Mom and pop type, a few blogs.
5. Most were either selling a product or a service, a few had adsense but usually as a supplement to their products or service.
6. Like me, all of them just wanted some sort response from a Google rep., anything. The silence was/is deafening.
What I didn't find was a single MFA or Scraper, its always been assumed that updates were to purge the serps of these type of sites, so why aren't any of them posting about being purged?
Personally, I think Google is an outstanding company, they have done a great deal for web publishers over the past few years, including myself. That's why I don't understand their update procedures, it just seems that every time they update so many decent sites with hard working people get crushed in the middle and their lack of communication is truly a mystery.
[edited by: tedster at 6:13 am (utc) on Mar. 9, 2007]
[edited by: alvin123 at 6:19 am (utc) on Mar. 9, 2007]
Not sure if this has been addressed - so many threads! - but does it make sense that Google would mix up the top results for popular queries, even on an hour-by-hour basis, to monitor bounce rates?
It does look like it is top results that are being affected.
I hope they are not relying on bounce rates because it is bad for sites that immediately give visitors information they searched for.
My sites seem to confirm that high ranking sites are affected. UK Widget News, which is no longer updated, has been unaffected. Widget Info (.co.uk) has about a third the usual number of visitors. It gets most of its traffic from keywords for which it was high (1-5) in the SERPS.
One odd thing is that some keywords are still at the top of the SERPS, others have gone from being at the top to being nowhere visible (presumable being buried deep, although I have not checked).
Both sites have similar link profiles (in fact a lot of the inlinks are the same), except that there are lots of links from Widget News to Widget Info, and Widget Info has more natural (unsolicited) one way deep links.