Forum Moderators: Robert Charlton & goodroi
In fact technically there is nothing called google.co.uk, but IPs and datacenters. Google.co.uk is just UK flavored datacenters, if I may say.
I have noticed [webmasterworld.com] the first sign of changes in backlinks on DC [216.239.59.107...] on 20th December 2006. Since then the backlinks on DCs kept changing.
At the moment there are around 29 DCs showing what you call "reverted" backlinks. Among those DCs are the DCs which I hit for google.co.uk, I assume:
64.233.183.99
64.233.183.103
64.233.183.104
64.233.183.147
As to what will be the next move you ask about, I must say; who knows. At the moment everything is fluctuating on the DCs and signs of major algo updates are there, IMO.
Lets wait and see ;-)
Dec 22 (and prior): 17,000+ (uniques)
Dec 23 : 14,000+
Dec 24 : 13,000+
Dec 25 : 10,000+
Dec 26 (Today) : 99 so far
At this rate (unless something changes soon), we'll be lucky to cross - or even reach - 1000 uniques today.
I'd say something's the matter, for sure ;-)
This site was started just a bit over 6 months ago, so OPs observation about BLs having
reverted to 6 months ago certainly seems to hold merit.
Fortunately for us, this site is a part of a long-term business plan, currently not in the 'revenue phase' nor critically
dependent on Google traffic, otherwise I'd be writing murder threats to Google or suiside notes here ;-)
@ web_savvy
a .co.uk site, 6 months old with 17,000 uniques/day in December 06, that is a fantastic achievement, 1,000 uniques per day, now , that would be internet joy for me
[edited by: tedster at 2:39 pm (utc) on Dec. 26, 2006]
In the 12 hours or so since my post above, our uniques count has reached 800+.
Somewhat interestingly, the GoogleBot has devoured some 4000+ pages off our site during these 12 hours, which is at least slightly above the normal rate. I wonder what gives.
I'd have thought that the crawling rate would be (more or less directly) proportionate to the number of BLs? If there is some substance in this, how is the bot crawling our site as usual, when it 'knows' no BLs to speak of? Could it be that the crawling bot is in the know of the real BLs, while the ranking algo 'sees' 6-month old status?
Google, you sure move about in mysterious ways, your wonders to perform!
[edited by: Web_Savvy at 8:41 pm (utc) on Dec. 26, 2006]
Please bear in mind the fact that our site in question here was launched just a bit over 6 months ago, with a completely fresh (previously unregistered) domain and all.
If Google is presently using 6 months old backlinks data in the ranking algo, there would be practically none for our site and hence the near to total obliteration of our pages from the SERPS.
Sites that have been around for longer times (probably yours too), with a good number of BLs existing 6 months ago, are not likely to see such a drastic reduction in traffic.
a .co.uk site, 6 months old with 17,000 uniques/day in December 06, that is a fantastic achievement, 1,000 uniques per day, now , that would be internet joy for me
Thanks for the compliments (Blushes....)
[We (painstakingly) built something of value for our users and then let a small number of them know about it. Thereafter, they (the users) took over, and bookmarked it, told others about it, and yes, linked to it. GoogleBot did (most of) the rest. Our actual traffic generation plan is not going to start before late 2007.]
The backlinks showing using link:http://www.example.co.uk on Google.co.uk has been fluxuating for some time now. We have gone from having 200ish showing, to 12 showing (what it was six months ago) to 0 showing. It has been bouncing around between these figures daily. BUT, today I checked Google.co.uk's own backlinks which were showing at 13,000 which is what they continue to show no matter what changes occur in the number of backlinks showing to my site.
What could be going on that would cause my backlinks to fluctuate wildly between new data, old data, and no data but for Googles own backlinks to stay exactly the same?
[edited by: tedster at 10:57 pm (utc) on Jan. 8, 2007]
Yesterday, for the first time since December 22, it crossed 3000 uniques and it looks to be all set to cross 4000 today.
Will report major movements here as and when they occur.