Thanx Dayo_UK, I see 2 sets of results. They are almost the same only on "post jagger 3 including the flux" DCs I rank 10 spots better.
lee_sufc
11:43 am on Nov 16, 2005 (gmt 0)
for me, the results on the following look excellent 64.233.189.104 66.102.7.104 216.239.53.104 216.239.57.104 216.239.63.104
...but after the past few weeks, I have learnt not to get too excited as these will probably change!
Kangol
11:45 am on Nov 16, 2005 (gmt 0)
Same thing here. Good results but they will probably change soon or never go online...
taps
11:46 am on Nov 16, 2005 (gmt 0)
Things are looking really good on some DCs. Are we talking about tree different result sets now? Jagger 2, Jagger 3 and Jagger 3 SP1?
j_do
11:49 am on Nov 16, 2005 (gmt 0)
@lee_sufc: I know what you mean. These results are almost too good to be true (for my site at least).
One thing I noticed: a subdomain spammer who got ditched previously is back again in these new (?) results.
WebPixie
11:59 am on Nov 16, 2005 (gmt 0)
Wake me up when it's over.
I'm up, I'm down I'm the same. Doesn't matter it will all change when jagger 3.67 comes out in a few days on three datacenters.
I hope this update is fixing something, because right now the results are very close to what they were pre-jagger in my market. If at the end of all this the SERPs have barely changed... What a massive waste of time this thing has been.
colin_h
12:06 pm on Nov 16, 2005 (gmt 0)
Hi Webpixie,
That's exactly what I've found. A lot of pain and very little difference to the serps. Maybe some movement in favour of big brand names, all in all I still think that more damage has been done by our fellow webmasters, seeing if they can knock off the competition.
Cheers Colin
taps
12:30 pm on Nov 16, 2005 (gmt 0)
Seems as it has stopped spreading. I see no further movement. Anyone else does?
