but those test could be related to a REAL fix on the non www issue and supplemental results, they are not testing for fun, so maybe part of that will come to the real serps.
lee_sufc
11:42 am on Nov 11, 2005 (gmt 0)
zeus - hope that is the case as the results for me are 500% better than what is proposed on the .9 DC that Jagger 3 is on!
GG said earlier that it wasn't going to be used for at least around a month so I can't see it happening in this update which means waiting all through Christmas!
One thing I have noticed though - in the .9 Jagger3 DC, I can still find a site I stopped using months and month ago in the SERPS but on [64.233.179.99...] it has gone (as it should be) and overall the SERPS look much much better (in my opinion of course) :-)
Kangol
11:43 am on Nov 11, 2005 (gmt 0)
64.233.179.99 is cleaner on my terms and my problems are solved. What do you think about this one? 66.249.87.104
lee_sufc
11:46 am on Nov 11, 2005 (gmt 0)
66.249.87.104 is better than what is coming up on .9 but still nowhere near as good as what is showing on 64.233.179.99
bekyed
11:52 am on Nov 11, 2005 (gmt 0)
Yes Googleguy.
We have been around for 7 years, never use any spam or anything on the page, people have linked to us as we had a high ranking site on google naturally. its easy to say you can't rely on google when running a business but how easy is that when everyone uses google and the other engines fade into comparison. We are no1 on yahoo for the same keywords and we are still down 60% on sales. Can anyone take a look for us please as i can see nothing wrong with the site, perhaps you experts at the forum will be able to help?
Bek.
Kangol
12:00 pm on Nov 11, 2005 (gmt 0)
I see over 25.000.000 results on 64.233.179.99 and about 5-6.000.000 on all the other DCs, why is that?
Dayo_UK
12:08 pm on Nov 11, 2005 (gmt 0)
64.233.179.99 - Just seems to be full of supplementals IMO.
Yes, they have a few more site:domain.com correctly ordered - but the data is soooooooooooo old.
But as we know this is just a test centre sitting in a corner - then fair enough use old results. Cant really see the improvements on the non-www situation Zeus.
zikos
12:12 pm on Nov 11, 2005 (gmt 0)
64.233.179.99 has solved my problem of duplicate content [mysite.com...] versus www.mysite.com probably Dayo-UK your proble is fixed as well there. And yes if it is a test center that means in the weeks to come as GG said there will be flux to come as they will get data from several DC's.
zikos
12:14 pm on Nov 11, 2005 (gmt 0)
"but those test could be related to a REAL fix on the non www issue and supplemental results, they are not testing for fun, " spot on Zeus
bekyed
12:16 pm on Nov 11, 2005 (gmt 0)
Hmmm,
There is something strange here on the dc on the results, 64.233.179.99 there is our website and a competitor below me, then on all the other dc's we are gone except everyone else is there. Do you think we have a chance of returning?