Forum Moderators: Robert Charlton & goodroi

Message Too Old, No Replies

Update Saga. Part 5

         

Brett_Tabke

8:26 pm on Nov 9, 2005 (gmt 0)

WebmasterWorld Administrator 10+ Year Member Top Contributors Of The Month



What say you?

Over and done with?

All done all through?

LegalAlien

8:15 am on Nov 11, 2005 (gmt 0)

10+ Year Member



2by4,

>> And besides, you really seem to be confused about this: why is any site deserving of any position in an absolute sense? Where do you get this idea from? What algorithm did you use to determine that a certain site had a right to a certain serp position? Can you show it to me? Is it published anywhere? Why does noone have access to this superior method? Would you be kind enough to publish it so we can all see it? <<

There you go again, implying that I said something that I didn't! I did not say that any site was deserving of any position. Nor did I say that there was any legal obligation on Google's part to ensure this.

What I did do was question your comparison of Google search with other media sources, which you obviously didn't like. As a result, the whole point of my original post has been lost in this unrelated squabble about who has the better understanding of corporate definitions.

First you misquote what I say. Then you go to town on this point with an overdose of sarcasm. Point taken. I won't question your authority in these matters again!

tigger

8:15 am on Nov 11, 2005 (gmt 0)

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member



I agree Dayo, it would be nice to see our traffic return so fast - we can live and hope my friend

reseller

8:16 am on Nov 11, 2005 (gmt 0)

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member Top Contributors Of The Month



GoogleGuy

>>tigger, it'll be gone by tomorrow or so. <<

Power to you tigger & GG!

And power to my shameless anti-spam promotion spots, as well :-)

And folks!

You see for yourselves now. A good example of "Spam Reporting" in action. A win-win deal!

tigger

8:20 am on Nov 11, 2005 (gmt 0)

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member



I don't know about a "win-win deal" I'll hold my breath until I see the outcome of this

GoogleGuy

8:21 am on Nov 11, 2005 (gmt 0)

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member



lee_sufc, I'm glad you like it. Eventually some of the stuff at the data center may come in to play, but it would be a months kinda timeframe, not a days or weeks kinda timeframe.

normasp

8:22 am on Nov 11, 2005 (gmt 0)



Hi GG, Good moorning here in spain ;)
I sent a lot of spam reports about a page that has hidden text (at the bottom, a lot of links) like matt cutts says in his blog, with the keyword jagger (1, 2, 3) but this page is still here..

lee_sufc

8:25 am on Nov 11, 2005 (gmt 0)

10+ Year Member Top Contributors Of The Month



Ok GG - look fowards to it - shame it wasn't being used now.... :-(

reseller

8:26 am on Nov 11, 2005 (gmt 0)

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member Top Contributors Of The Month



Dayo_UK

>>For the first time for a very very long time I am seeing my Homepage outrank internal pages on some searches on the J3 Dcs. - In position 400+ - but it outranks the internal :) <<

Should I understand that you intend to join us in "Jagger3 Fans Club" :-)

lee_sufc

8:26 am on Nov 11, 2005 (gmt 0)

10+ Year Member Top Contributors Of The Month



also, GG, is there still going to be Flux in the .9 DC before it is used?

Mountdoom

8:30 am on Nov 11, 2005 (gmt 0)

10+ Year Member



GG, how busy is googlebot these days - has it got a lot of catching up to do? The algo may have been decided on, but presumably the flux goes on?
This 1356 message thread spans 136 pages: 1356