Update Saga. Part 5

[Brett_Tabke]

What say you?

Over and done with?

All done all through?

[2by4]

gg, what's the deal with backlink spamming? Is Google considering that spam or not? On page stuff is trivial, this is the real problem.

[reseller]

GG

Very encouraging indeed! Thanks.

And here is "One for the Gipper" :-)

Folks! Don't wait to send Jagger-related spam feedback; I'd send that now. Using the keyword "Jagger3" at [google.com...] will get someone reading and checking it out.

P.S. Thanks joeduck for "Gipper" :-)

[edited by: reseller at 7:15 am (utc) on Nov. 11, 2005]

[tigger]

GG

should I resubmit the report if I see no action, or just leave it till the next shuffle / update?

[reseller]

zimba

"Reseller >>> I see alot to do with link quality in *9*, key phrases on each page and anchor text within links playing a very important roll. Your thoughts? "

Sounds like the good old whitehat SEO days, and nothing is new under Jagger3 sun ;-)

[Dayo_UK]

GG

Do you want reports on Canonlization issues? - you mentioned that you would send out a request at some stage?

Still the reinclusion request with the term canonicalpage get to the correct engineers?

Thanks

Dayo

[WebPixie]

Well that's it then. Sadly my sites are doing well on *9* so as much as I'd like to rage against the machine, I'll just have to be content. :)

Hopefully next update I'll have something to complain about. ;)

[joeduck]

GG - are supplemental problems off the table for now? Any idea when those will be addressed?

Reseller - it's "Gipper":

George Gipp on his deathbed said, “Rock, someday when things look real tough for Notre Dame, ask the boys to go out there and win for me.

[zimba]

GG
Im seriously impressed with how *9* seems to have penalised sites using dodgy methods. *9* hasnt deleted these sites from what I see but brought through the non dodgy site to the front. Whether this is by chance on the keywords I only watch or for all other sites I dont know, but so far I reckon *9* rocks.

From my side I cant see any evidence that G is trying to make more money from its SERPS. In fact from my side it would seem G is staying true to its core.

WELL DONE

[reseller]

Folks!

I see Matt posted something very interesting. Guess he is going now after "spammy doorway domains" ;-)

SEO Mistakes: Autogenerated doorway domains

[mattcutts.com...]

But to be fair, I wouldn't call it "SEO Mistakes", because its more a "Spammers Mistakes" :-)

[GoogleGuy]

tigger, I'd resend. Try to make the reports short, clear, and demonstrate a query that is spammed. It's possible that someone disagreed (e.g. you thought it was keyword stuffing, the person that saw the report thought that our scoring handled in okay).