Sorry for being dense, but which *9* dc are we talking about? I've been out of the loop for a week (my daughter had an emergency appendectomy on Monday). While I was there I asked the surgeon about my SERPS problem and he gave me some cream...
reseller
9:20 am on Nov 11, 2005 (gmt 0)
Good night GG
And thanks for feedback and "spam reporting" actions.
Kangol
9:20 am on Nov 11, 2005 (gmt 0)
Will there be any more changes on 9? There are some things that do not look right from what I am looking at.
64.233.179.99 solves some of the problems I see on 9 right now.
Eazygoin
9:28 am on Nov 11, 2005 (gmt 0)
Mountdoom>>
66.102.9.104 is what you're looking for :-)
LegalAlien
9:31 am on Nov 11, 2005 (gmt 0)
>> What does everyone else here think of [64.233.179.99?...] <<
In our area it appears to be a reshuffle of the same top-30 sites that appear on .9, plus 3 or 4 additional sites that don't exist on .9. I also noticed a few large sites with additional (indented) pages listed, whereas these additional listings don't appear on .9.
Apart from that, I don't see too much difference -- at least in the first three pages (I checked 5 phrases).
McMohan
9:31 am on Nov 11, 2005 (gmt 0)
64.233.179.99 looks to me like a merger of pre-jagger and Jagger. Surprised to see Mcdar tool isn't giving the actual rankings in this dc?
Mountdoom
9:32 am on Nov 11, 2005 (gmt 0)
Thanks Eazygoin. I was afraid that was it. Will order more serps cream...
steveb
9:36 am on Nov 11, 2005 (gmt 0)
64.233.179.99
Hopelessly old data, with many more supplementals, unfortunately. It even includes a bunch of pages that the rest of Google knows have been 301ed for over a month.
Definitely not ready for prime time.
[edited by: steveb at 9:37 am (utc) on Nov. 11, 2005]
Kangol
9:37 am on Nov 11, 2005 (gmt 0)
On 64.233.179.99 I am on #15, on 9 I am on #38... I see less keyword.freehost.com/keyword.html spam there. Well, back to the drawing board...
zammo
9:46 am on Nov 11, 2005 (gmt 0)
Am starting to see some of our bigger client sites with lots of recips coming back to where they previously were in the SERPS. These sites got hit from day one but we sat tight and that seems to have been a wise move. The only site that is not back in SERPS yet, is our own site but when we do an allinanchor and allintitle search we appear on the first page for most of our major keywords. I recall this happening whilst we were in the 'sandbox', so I think there is the possibility that we have been sandboxed again. Why I am not 100 pc sure? But we did re-skin our front-end a few months ago (but kept more or less the same content) so maybe Google has sandboxed us for this.
