Forum Moderators: Robert Charlton & goodroi
My initial thought was that they've fixed the broken "site:" command, but this is not the case, as I can see from other affected sites.
Background: I should add that I have a number of trashed sites, and a number which were unaffected by June 27. All are professional, business information sites with decent traffic. All have the same structure and there is no connection between those which were hit and those which weren't. Finding a distinguishing feature of the affected sites has been a priority task for us these past six weeks, but there does not appear to be one. Until today, all the trashed sites have shown the classic broken "site:" command, and all the unaffected ones have returned a more conventional "site:" command result.