Forum Moderators: Robert Charlton & goodroi
About two weeks ago I decided to submit a sitemap to Google. (What a fool I am) Within days the entire site went supplemental. Every page!
Now no traffic from Google.
So now try and convince me sitemaps didn't have anything to do with it!
Wow, we were experiencing exactly the same soon after submitting our sitemap back in January! Almost all forum posts supplemental, every other bit doing quite well.
I had pages come out of supp hell, more pages going into the main index, new pages getting crawled and indexed within just a few days, pages moving up in the serps, traffic went way up, refferals from google more than doubled etc. cant say all this is directly from sitemap removal, just that it all happened after the removal.
Believe me I will never use it again.
Are we supposed to believe the data Google gleans from sitemaps is *just right* while you tell us the data we receive from Google is *wonky*?
1) A list of URLs for a crawler is a whole different kettle of fish from a reporting application.
2) If the data that Google's crawler gleans with the help of a sitemap is "wonky," then shouldn't data gleaned without that list of URLs be just as wonky, if not more so?
One method seems to have created industry domination while the other seems to have created mass confusion. I'd just as soon keep the old tried and true...
There have been recently several Data Refreshes which have affected several fellow members sites (as reported on related threads). And your site could have been affected too by those Data Refreshes, not by the Sitemaps.
Honestly I can't see any feature on the Sitemaps which could affect your ranking or cause your site or pages to be deindexed or turned supplementals.