Forum Moderators: goodroi

Message Too Old, No Replies

GOOG below $300

         

walkman

8:02 pm on Nov 12, 2008 (gmt 0)



[finance.yahoo.com...]
It's better than most financials and Yhoo but it still must hurt, it was $724 this year

dailypress

9:12 pm on Nov 12, 2008 (gmt 0)

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member



Google falls below $300 for 1st time since 2005

Shares of Google fall under $300 to lowest levels since 2005 on predicted online ad weakness

[biz.yahoo.com...]

frontpage

9:52 pm on Nov 12, 2008 (gmt 0)

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member



Last 12 November 2007 Google closed at $632.07 today $291.00. A greater than 50% loss of equity in one year. Google stock has under performed the DOW by 20% in the past year. MSFT (Microsoft) has out performed Google in stock price by 10%. Yahoo stock and Google stock are comparable in their losses.

signor_john

5:55 pm on Nov 13, 2008 (gmt 0)



Hey, it's a tough world out there, as this TechCrunch article [techcrunch.com] points out. The Google analyst at Citigroup who's featured in the article concludes that Google is better-positioned than most Internet companies to withstand the current crunch, and that "Google is sneezing, but everybody else just got the flu."

(BTW, I'm not at all sure that "everybody else" got the flu; based on the CPMs that I've been seeing lately, I suspect that some vertical ad networks, rep firms, and specialist publishers will be coughing and sneezing less than the big general-interest aggregators, portals, and media companies are. But that's a topic for another thread in another forum.)

rocco

6:56 pm on Nov 13, 2008 (gmt 0)

10+ Year Member



(BTW, I'm not at all sure that "everybody else" got the flu; based on the CPMs that I've been seeing lately, I suspect that some vertical ad networks, rep firms, and specialist publishers will be coughing and sneezing less than the big general-interest aggregators, portals, and media companies are. But that's a topic for another thread in another forum.)

I feel the same, but most of these players are irrelevant for being talked about. ;) We have the best days ever, but that may change as well.

walkman

1:27 am on Nov 14, 2008 (gmt 0)



Goog is well positioned because it has $14 Billion in cash! If you remember early 2000, you know how good it is to have a few years of cash reserves! You never know how bad it gets or how long it will last

Brett_Tabke

7:51 pm on Nov 19, 2008 (gmt 0)

WebmasterWorld Administrator 10+ Year Member Top Contributors Of The Month



It looks mighty tempting at $282 a share eh!? I've not been so interested, since it was under $200.

Think it will go under $200?

rj87uk

8:16 pm on Nov 19, 2008 (gmt 0)

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member



>> Think it will go under $200?

Depends on how much longer the "world recession" lasts.

I say world recession as it seems most countries are borderline recession or in recession!

goodroi

1:49 pm on Nov 20, 2008 (gmt 0)

WebmasterWorld Administrator 10+ Year Member Top Contributors Of The Month



if it goes under $200 a share will brett include a google stock certificate in next years pubcon goody bag?

Habtom

2:01 pm on Nov 20, 2008 (gmt 0)

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member



goodroi, I wasn't there at this years pubcon, but I would have been very generous with my Lehman stock certificates :). Depending on how Google performs, you might find me very generous with my Google stock certificates at the next pubcon.

(if only I owned any Google stock certificates)

zett

12:20 pm on Nov 22, 2008 (gmt 0)

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member



Just love it to see Google tank. Great!

Always thought that Google stock is way overvalued, given the fact that they run a one-and-a-half trick pony (search and text ads). Expect the stock below $200 in 2009.

signor_john

4:22 pm on Nov 23, 2008 (gmt 0)



Just love it to see Google tank. Great!

You might want to look at Google's third-quarter financial results [investor.google.com] before sending the invitations out for your "Google is Tanking" celebration party.

zett

3:27 pm on Nov 24, 2008 (gmt 0)

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member



You might want to look at Google's third-quarter financial results before sending the invitations out

Yep, been there, done that. You know what? The market has priced this in already. That's the reason the stock is tanking.

As of now, GOOG is trading around $260, which is very close to the 52 week low. It is a market reaction to their performance and outlook. (The stock was at $724 about a year ago.)

zett

8:49 pm on Nov 24, 2008 (gmt 0)

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member



Final note: Dow +6.4%, NASDAQ +6.5%, GOOG -2.5%

Google stalls while the rest of the market rocks. LOL. I guess more people have read and understood the 3rd quarter results. :-)

signor_john

12:24 am on Nov 25, 2008 (gmt 0)



I think it's pretty clear that Google is more interested in building a company for the long haul than being the darling of day traders. Still, if you're correct in your belief that Google is tanking, it means we can stop listening to those who claim Google is an unstoppable monopoly that will take over the world. :-)

signor_john

4:55 pm on Nov 26, 2008 (gmt 0)



GOOG's share value rose 9.6 percent on Tuesday, following a positive report from Barclays Capital. See Bloomberg article [bloomberg.com].

Side note to the above: Last month, Barclays lowered its forecast of U.S. online ad spending to $24.8 billion. That's still an impressive number: To see how the online ad market has grown in recent years (with Google obviously enjoying a healthy share of that growth), see this PricewaterhouseCoopers/IAB graph [iab.net] of quarterly Internet advertising expenditures from 2000 through 3Q 2008.

zett

6:07 pm on Nov 26, 2008 (gmt 0)

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member



GOOG's share value rose 9.6 percent on Tuesday, following a positive report from

That confirms my belief that Google is an unstoppable monopoly that will take over the world. :-)

signor_john

6:38 pm on Nov 26, 2008 (gmt 0)



Maybe, but only 9.6 percent at a time. :-)