Forum Moderators: goodroi
The info page says it's a distributed crawler, so just like my policy for the cronic robots.txt violater Grub, I banned the user agent and the entire IP block associated with the offending IP.
I never said that my bot is flawless, however I can't verify bug report if it lacks specifics.
Already covered multiple times in this thread. I offered more information. You rejected my offer. You kept on with the sarcasm and insults. I withdrew my offer.
Your attitude suggests to me that you were looking for some cheap bashing without any desire to back up your words with proof. Generally the people who act like that have no proof in the first place.
And your attitude suggest to me an arrogant jackass, which is why I withdrew my offer of assistance. I offered more data. You rejected the offer. Then you try to say that I have no proof because you rejected my offer to supply you more information.
This is all just repeating what has been covered multiple times in this thread.
And your attitude suggest to me an arrogant jackass
I will let the readers judge on who is who :)
Since you progressed to name calling I take it that this discussion is pretty much over. I am still interested in your domain name to ensure future compliance with your robots.txt I am happy to add your site to a very short list of permanently banned sites. I promise not to actually look at your site, and in a few years I will tell you whether I noticed its abscense from the index or not :)
[edited by: Lord_Majestic at 7:27 pm (utc) on June 14, 2005]
But from what i was reading you are not being very cooperative with Lord Majestic when he clearly is asking for the information he needs to look into the problem and you are not giving him the exact information he asked for.
That exact subject has already been covered multiple times in this thread so rather the repeat it here, I suggest you try reading the thread more objectively so you won't gloss over statements you might have missed.
Infact you could have stopped this 4 page fun read if you just gave him that information.
Or he might have stopped the thread by examining the information I offered rather than rejecting it as insufficient without even examining it.
Infact im rather amazed at how long this thread has went on for.
You and me both.
Or he might have stopped the thread by examining the information I offered rather than rejecting it as insufficient without even examining it.
There was nothing to reject, no information that could have reasonably lead to establishing whether something was wrong with my implementation of robots.txt standard.
I take it that this discussion is pretty much over.
I thought it was over long ago since the same things just kept getting repeated over and over.
I am still interested in your domain name to ensure future compliance with your robots.txt
Already covered multiple times in this thread.
I won't quote the rest of your post since it's just more of the same sarcasm that fanned the flames of this thread to begin with.
Or he might have stopped the thread by examining the information I offered rather than rejecting it as insufficient without even examining it.
Dont worry I did read it all and again it all comes down to you posting your robots.txt - That has been covered so many times (you say) in this thread.
Infact (Yes I know again) - Why dont you post it now to shut everyone up :) You know - to add a twist to this thread!