Welcome to WebmasterWorld Guest from 54.145.55.135

Forum Moderators: goodroi

Message Too Old, No Replies

Google Link points and Robots.txt

Google points algo and side discussion of robots.txt format

     

tmw

12:57 pm on Mar 3, 2001 (gmt 0)

Inactive Member
Account Expired

 
 


does google have any points fixed for particular type of linking ie wheather use any points for links which affects the ranking.
thank you
5:46 pm on Mar 23, 2001 (gmt 0)

Moderator from US 

WebmasterWorld Administrator robert_charlton is a WebmasterWorld Top Contributor of All Time 10+ Year Member Top Contributors Of The Month

joined:Nov 11, 2000
posts:11569
votes: 240


>>I think you are saying where you are linked from does effect ranking though<<

Not my links, but competitive rankings I've been tracking as I'm analyzing how to rank in the "widget stores" area, which is highly competitive.

I've noticed that several of the top 10 have one thing in common... they're listed in the Regional> Widget Dealers> Location> Directories category... whereas sites with more or less equal optimization (so it seems... it's very difficult to analyze someone else's site quickly) that are listed in other categories aren't doing as well.

It could also be the content of link text (something I haven't fully checked yet) as well as other links. I was fascinated that one of the very high ranking sites only had passable optimization and 4 links (as opposed to 1,200 for the site above it). One of the links was from the Yahoo 'Directories' category... and the other was from a Stanford University site, apparently a student page, that had the exact plural form phrase linking to this site.

Again, I probably haven't made enough observations to generalize about the category listing... Brett's comment prompts me to check out some of the other factors more closely.

6:49 pm on Mar 26, 2001 (gmt 0)

Full Member

joined:June 11, 2004
posts:234
votes: 0


Yahoo now equals 0 points for linkpop

See:
[webmasterworld.com ]
and
[dir.yahoo.com ]

BullDog

Xoc

2:33 pm on Mar 27, 2001 (gmt 0)

Senior Member

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member

joined:Jan 18, 2001
posts:1437
votes: 0


The problem is that there is no definitive spec for robots.txt. As far as I know, there is no W3C or RFC spec for it. So it means whatever a search engine wants it to mean. Do search engines use wildcards? Google does. Does an earlier rule override a later one? Looksmart seems to think so. But does Google? Who knows what Google really does with Looksmart's robots.txt.

The problem is not just for spiders. How do you come up with a correct robots.txt, when the spec is ambiguous?

Edited by: Xoc

2:53 pm on Mar 27, 2001 (gmt 0)

Administrator from US 

WebmasterWorld Administrator brett_tabke is a WebmasterWorld Top Contributor of All Time 10+ Year Member Top Contributors Of The Month

joined:Sept 21, 1999
posts:38063
votes: 13


Best I can figure, there are 8200 Looksmart [google.com] urls in google.
This 34 message thread spans 2 pages: 34