Forum Moderators: open

Message Too Old, No Replies

I Just got Robbed at the back of the grocery store

What an experience

         

ganderla

11:51 pm on Dec 14, 2005 (gmt 0)

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member



So I was heading to the back of the grocery store to pick up a script for my mother in law. She need anti-nausea pills during her chemo.

Then all of a sudden out of the blue, the pharmacist said:

"Well here are her 10 pills, she need to take one every eight hours. That will be $368.95."

The rest was all a blur.

kaled

11:59 pm on Dec 14, 2005 (gmt 0)

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member



Are these special pills for chemo? I thought travel sickness pills combatted nausea.

Kaled.

Hawkgirl

12:10 am on Dec 15, 2005 (gmt 0)

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member



Chemo-induced nausea is a HUGE problem and definitely isn't controlled with "normal" drugs. And boy, they can definitely be expensive. If she doesn't have insurance coverage and you've gotta pay full price for those babies, I recommend two things: first (and most important!), ask the nurse for samples (they usually have some they can give out), and second, find out if her doctor works with a social worker who can help find her less expensive meds. :)

You're a good son-in-law.

willybfriendly

12:21 am on Dec 15, 2005 (gmt 0)

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member



Move to Oregon. Get a medical marijuana card.

Far less expensive, and many say more effective.

WBF

ganderla

1:03 am on Dec 15, 2005 (gmt 0)

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member



She does have insurance, but we had to get these 10 for an emergency as we ran out of the samples. We were able to get some more samples today. We are waiting for her insurance company to approve them.

We also talked to her surgeon's assistant today and she said when she had chemo, the only thing that worked for her was Demerol and benadryl. That would be much cheaper.

jk3210

1:16 am on Dec 15, 2005 (gmt 0)

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member



Hawkgirl, I've been meaning to mention this to you for a while now, but having watched a parent go through the final stage of Renal-Cell Carcinoma, I can tell you that the professionalism of the people in your line of work is sincerely appreciated more than you'll ever know.

vincevincevince

9:54 am on Dec 15, 2005 (gmt 0)

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member



If you were in the UK, that would be around $12 for the pills (all meds are the same price per prescription). And if she were on a low income with few assets, free. (Meds given during hospital care are, like the care, free).

Dayo_UK

9:57 am on Dec 15, 2005 (gmt 0)



Yes, and still people complain in this country though....

I had to go on some pills and searched on the internet for things (BTW - not a good idea - you just end up reading about horrible side effects) - I was amazed at the prices that were quoted on the sites though.

Essex_boy

10:08 am on Dec 15, 2005 (gmt 0)

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member Top Contributors Of The Month



Makes you grateful for the NHS doesnt Uk members?

dragonthoughts

10:13 am on Dec 15, 2005 (gmt 0)

10+ Year Member



Also, in the UK, even if you do have assets and an income, but know you are on long term medications, you can prepay for a prescription season ticket.

I know that form personal experience. I have a chronic pain condition.

On grounds of medical costs, I'm only too pleased that I live in the UK - In many other countries, my medical bills would have made me destitute and uninsurable.

walkman

5:41 pm on Dec 15, 2005 (gmt 0)



>> Makes you grateful for the NHS doesnt Uk members?

someone pays for that anyway, money doesn't grow on trees. They tax you more so you can wait 6 months for a "free" dental appointment.

oddsod

6:17 pm on Dec 15, 2005 (gmt 0)

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member



spot on, walkman!

The NHS is a highly inefficient way of delivering medical services. Despite having some of the best doctors, nurses and other staff UK medical care lags the rest of the developed world in many respects. We pay an average of £2,000 per person into the NHS every year for every man, woman and baby (over £100 billion annual budget) whether we use any NHS services or not. As not everyone is an earner that burden is likely about £6,000-£8,000 per working person per year.

£65 in every £100 of that goes towards management/admin.

I've moved to a new town and haven't been able to get a dentist for the last year. That's despite the fact that I pay for all my treatments. I desperately need some fillings and am considering going to France to get them done. I suspect the NHS/UK government won't give me a refund of my costs. That's a pretty sorry state of affairs. And my problem is pretty minor.

bobothecat

6:26 pm on Dec 15, 2005 (gmt 0)



someone pays for that anyway, money doesn't grow on trees. They tax you more so you can wait 6 months for a "free" dental appointment.

I just had treatment for periodontal disease, and that was $1100 out-of-pocket after insurance. :(

It only took the dentist 30 minutes...

vincevincevince

6:40 pm on Dec 15, 2005 (gmt 0)

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member



The NHS is a highly inefficient way of delivering medical services.

I know from a previous field of employment that the NHS obtains the vast majority of medicines and medical devices at very substantial discounts from the manufaturers. A certain implantable device is sold at about 4 times the price to the US, and 7 times the price to Japan when measured against the NHS. Not only that - but there is no such thing as waiting for your insurance to approve a medicine - a doctor can prescribe any medicine which is authorised as safe. Then don't forget that there are no shareholders. Interestingly, and certainly not unrelated, the UK alone contributes about one third of all published medical research - I don't call that inefficient!

<edit>Just to clarify - the reason for the price difference is because the whole country purchases in bulk, instead of individual hospitals - I didn't meant to imply any bias on the part of a company</edit>

[edited by: vincevincevince at 6:43 pm (utc) on Dec. 15, 2005]

steve40

6:41 pm on Dec 15, 2005 (gmt 0)

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member



Interesting discussion
having spent a good part of my life in the UK and had a heart attack some 28 years ago I would say for urgent care i.e. heart attack the UK is as good if not better than anywhere else in the world .
But when it comes to GP visits because it is free the same few people seem to monopolise the service and you need to make an appointment 1 week prior to being ill.
Providing you are covered in the US with health insurance and accept the principle of CO-PAY the health cover is in general better than under the NHS .

I think there are problems with both systems
In the UK because it's free it's abused and some health care workers forget that the people needing treatment are paying customers through ( National Insurance Deductions ) .
In the US no cover is given free for children unless people are willing to jump through hoops and made to feel like low class citizens. and the poorest in society do not have access to a fair health system for all. and One last comment due to a free market economy the price of Medicine is not justifiable when the same medicines are sold in other countries at a much lower cost by the same companies

just my 2 cents worth having been the recipient of healthcare in both countries

steve

Dayo_UK

6:44 pm on Dec 15, 2005 (gmt 0)



>>>>But when it comes to GP visits because it is free the same few people seem to monopolise the service and you need to make an appointment 1 week prior to being ill.

That is certainly not the case now at my GP. The level of service really is 1st class.

However, this might depend on GP to GP.

Dentist on the other hand are very very hard to get in to.

oddsod

6:52 pm on Dec 15, 2005 (gmt 0)

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member



vincevincevince, this is straying into the political :)

I'll be the first to admit emergency treatment is pretty good (though I've seen better. 3-4 hour waits in A&E are quite normal here). But, the NHS does get volume discounts however, the downside is that they are very cosy with some manufacturers. I can list various questionable buying policies from powderject to live polio vaccines. But I certainly don't think that funding a third of worldwide medical research is a good way of spending UK taxpayers' money. I'm paying for all these doctors to play with test tubes, am I? When the local GP will see you only if you've had the decency to plan your illness two weeks in advance and your urgent operation could be rescheduled 8 times in a year? Ah, that's OK, at least we've published 3% more papers this year? C'mon!

ganderla, $368.95 is small change compared to the $500,000 average cost per person over a normal working life .... for an NHS. (Unless your average annual medical insurance is more than $12K per working person).

walkman

8:25 pm on Dec 15, 2005 (gmt 0)



no one system is perfect, and I don't think a such system can exist. Maybe when we can get unlimited resources :). Some will benefit, some will get screwed. If you have a chronic disease and only make $30K a year, you will probably benefit from a state sponsored health system, as let's say 5% health tax is not much. However, if you're a healthy male, who hasn't seen the doctor in 5 years and make $250K, you will get ripped off; you will be paying for lonely grandmas going to the doctor every day because they feel bored, or people getting every test in the book because it's "free."

as far as paying $1100 after the insurance: it happens. You could've paid $1000 a year in taxes for a service you use once very 10 years, and hope the teeth don't fall off while waiting for a periodontist to schedule you.

Rugles

7:34 pm on Dec 16, 2005 (gmt 0)

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member



>>Move to Oregon. Get a medical marijuana card.
>>Far less expensive, and many say more effective.

I am not in Oregon, but I have a friend who smoked for his chemo here in Ontario, it worked like a charm. All with his doctors blessings. Made him less depressed too. Seems like the way to go if you ask me, and it is legal here for that purpose.

He is healthy now.

Essex_boy

7:48 pm on Dec 16, 2005 (gmt 0)

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member Top Contributors Of The Month



The thing I like about the NHS is that its there for everybody to use. Now Ive only ever had to use it once when I had an accident, but I dont resent paying taxes so someone else can use it.

I.e I pay for them and when I need to use it someone pays for me.

Its not perfect, unlike me, but hell its a lot better than most other health services.

bsterz

7:57 pm on Dec 16, 2005 (gmt 0)

10+ Year Member



Recently my wifes aunt successfully applied for assistance from a pharm company. Saved here over $800 per month.

brdwlsh

11:39 pm on Dec 16, 2005 (gmt 0)

10+ Year Member



ditto on the cannabis.

i've known two people--first hand--who have endured chemo. vaporizing is the safest means, smoking will do. nausea is immediately eliminated allowing for the ingestion of food and necessary medication. only a little is needed, unless you like the 'side effect'.

Syzygy

12:49 am on Dec 17, 2005 (gmt 0)

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member



I desperately need some fillings and am considering going to France to get them done. I suspect the NHS/UK government won't give me a refund of my costs.

Much of mainland Europe has issued pan-European Medical cards for cross-border use. In the UK, you still (I believe) need to use Form 111 (available from the Post Office) when seeking medical assistance within EU member states. I also believe that you are entitled to claim back any costs incurred - although you would need to investigate further to find out exactly what entitlements are.

Try the European Commission [europa.eu.int] for more information - it is worth looking into.

Syzygy

vincevincevince

3:04 pm on Dec 17, 2005 (gmt 0)

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member



I suspect the NHS/UK government won't give me a refund of my costs.

There are schemes that allow you to have some the work done abroad or at a private facility, but you have to try to have it at your local facility first so you can show that it wasn't available on the NHS.