Forum Moderators: open

Message Too Old, No Replies

It's a head scratcher

         

vibgyor79

1:01 pm on Nov 5, 2005 (gmt 0)

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member



This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed. If you are not the named addressee you should not disseminate, distribute or copy this e-mail. Please notify the sender immediately by e-mail if you have received this e-mail by mistake and delete this e-mail from your system.

Who do people put crap like this in their emails?

pmkpmk

1:10 pm on Nov 5, 2005 (gmt 0)

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member



Bad experience. A colleague of mine gut sued one day because of a confidental email which got leaked to a 3rd party. Our lawyer told us that IF we would have a disclaimer like that in our mails, not my colleague but actually the leaker would have been sued.

Automan Empire

9:23 pm on Nov 5, 2005 (gmt 0)

10+ Year Member



Yup. Living in California really makes one consider the lawsuit angles, to the point of seeming ridiculously paranoid. May this mindset never need to spread to your area!

Old_Honky

11:09 pm on Nov 5, 2005 (gmt 0)

10+ Year Member Top Contributors Of The Month



We sell Italian made steam cleaners that are also sold in the USA. Because of the US tendency towards litigation the instructions that are first made in american english have to be drastically altered for the (still slightly more sensible) UK. They also put labels on everything saying things like "do not use this 130 degrees C steam jet to clean clothes while you are wearing them" and "do not point the steam jet at animals or children".

I find it sad that people are not prepared to take responsibility for their own actions and are seemingly always ready to blame some one else for their lack of common sense.

jsinger

12:06 am on Nov 6, 2005 (gmt 0)

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member



Then there's McDonald's which passes nearly boiling hot coffee thru car windows incurring hundreds of nearly identical lawsuits when the liquid inevitably tumbles onto laps of adults, kids and one very famous old lady, some of whom were driving when burned.

McDonald's chose to scald thousands of its customers because it thought that 185 degree coffee tasted a bit better. Most restaurants make do with 165 degree coffee and a lot smaller legal department.

vibgyor79

5:07 am on Nov 6, 2005 (gmt 0)

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member



What will happen when spammers start putting those things in their emails?

tbear

11:56 am on Nov 6, 2005 (gmt 0)

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member Top Contributors Of The Month



some of whom were driving when burned

Ermmm, one assumes they were drinking coffee whilst driving :o
Now that has got to be an infringement of the law in most countries :)

jsinger

2:48 pm on Nov 6, 2005 (gmt 0)

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member



It's legal to drink (coffee) or eat while driving in my state. Once saw a woman eating a bowl of soup while she steered her car, somehow. Some states prohibit driving and talking on a cell phone.

vincevincevince

6:04 pm on Nov 6, 2005 (gmt 0)

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member



I don't think that disclaimer was written by anyone remotely connected to a lawyer. Even me with my poor excuse for a brain can see the following:

This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed. If you are not the named addressee you should not disseminate, distribute or copy this e-mail. Please notify the sender immediately by e-mail if you have received this e-mail by mistake and delete this e-mail from your system.

1. There is nothing to stop you "disseminating, distributing or copying" the FILES. The text only limits the email, and the first part of the text specifically separates the "email and any files transmitted with it".

2. Nothing to stop you printing, or faxing, or reading out on the phone. That is because once transmitted into any form other than email it is no longer an email, but just represents the information which was previously within the email.

3. Impossible clause by requiring immediate notification and deletion. The only way an immediate notification could be sent is if the system sent it automatically, and without delaying for user prompt. Perhaps, just to be sure, we should automatically delete and notify senders of all messages with such a deletion clause.

4. Having immediately deleted the email, how do you know who the sender is? Unless, of course, you have copied some part of the email (the sender). In that case we can assume that copying parts of the email is permitted despite the fact that the email as a whole has had the limitation requested.

5. I don't have much knowledge of law, but I believe that for me to be bound by such a contract I have to agree to be bound as such. The reader of this post must immediately send me $1000. Did that bind you? If not, then why should reading an instruction within an email. The only way I can see that this disclaimer could carry any weight is if it said "This is a confidential message etc blah blah, if you accept these terms and are the right guy then click here [........]

tbear

7:02 pm on Nov 6, 2005 (gmt 0)

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member Top Contributors Of The Month



Wow, vincevincevince, no wonder they named you three times :)

Leosghost

7:51 pm on Nov 6, 2005 (gmt 0)

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member Top Contributors Of The Month



i'm waiting for the first chain mail letter from Nigeria with this on