Forum Moderators: open
I would want my plug pulled. That's not "life" to me.
as for the other situation, where you will be a bump on a log as long as they feed you, i would choose to have the plug pulled. donate my organs to someone who needs them.
i couldn't imagine putting my family through daily torture.
as bad as this current story is, it's brought a realization that its a real situation and a lot of people have been making decisions and having a living will written.
I wouldn't want to have my vegetative state be used as fodder for demagogues to get people all riled up over this particular individual's case, leaving no more curiosity/indignation for all the worse things going on meanwhile.
Personally, I draw a strong distinction between quality of life and quantity. Others feel different. This is where subjects such as this get hairy.
After all, people have come out of comas that lasted for decades.
[edited by: lawman at 4:36 am (utc) on Mar. 26, 2005]
weird..I guess one can recover from it.
Happily divorced man here ;)
not related to the thread, but protein (from meat and especially bone marrow) made our brain as large as it is. No offense to the vegetarians; facts are facts
As the technology advances to allow an evermore intergrated relationship between thought and computer aided communication the concept of "quality of life" is bound to become more critical in these matters, and even more subjective than it is today.
Today's measure of life, and it's quality, might lead one to make certain directives as when to call it quits.
Tommorow's measure might be a whole different story, and lead to a whole different conclusion.
To be left lingering with no means of meaningful communication is not something I would care for.
Which of course begs for a definition of meaningful.
Hard questions.
And I'm sure none of you would favour death or any of those groups. Many of whom have a low quality of life, may not be likely to recover, contribute nothing to society and are a substantial burden, and don't enjoy the life they are living.
1. Is the person in a vegetative state.
2. Did the person express a preference.
Apparently the courts in this case have determined that a vegetative state exists and that a preference against living in such a state was expressed.
BTW, I have no info other than what I've heard in the news media.