Forum Moderators: open
He was recommended by the Minister of Treasury Gordon Brown, because of his "outstanding contribution to economy, employment, education and the volunteership movement in Great Britain".
-- Zak
He donated $100 million to help fight aids. On one hand that is a lot of money.. but on the other compared to the amount of money he has it's not.
So maybe he's not that great... but at least he does have a heart (no matter how big or little it is) and donates a portion of it to a good cause.
Bill Gates could have spent his money on himself and stupid TV stunts (like a certain internet billionaire I could name) and ensured that the next 10 generations of Gates would never have to lift a finger to work. Instead, he chose to help others.
Say what you will about MSN and their business practices, Bill Gates deserves his knighthood for being an extreamly generous man.
Bob Geldof (an Irish citizen) got a similar honour a few years back for his charity work.
Well, HE starred in Pink Floyd, The Wall. What has Bill Gates done that was nearly as cool?
Foo-lish jokes aside, I don't have a problem with Gates' wealth... but that PAPER CLIP has earned my wrath at every opportunity! Still, Knight?
I am humbled and delighted. I'm particularly pleased that this honour helps recognize the real heroes our foundation supports to improve health in poor countries. Their incredible work is helping ensure that one day all people - no matter where they are born - will have the same opportunity for a healthy life, and I'm humbled to share this honour with them.Full coverage: [royal.gov.uk...]
Is it me or does Her Majesty looks a bit sceptical? I mean, it's an official photo, isn't it?
P.S. The Buckingham Palace seems to run IIS :-)
I'm still trying to figure out why the Queen of England would even consider knighting him, dispite his contributions, because he's not a member of Britain or a Commonwealth State... just doesn't seem right.
Previous U.S. citizens receiving honorary Knighthoods include former U.S. Presidents Ronald Reagan and George H. W. Bush, former New York Mayor Rudolph Giuliani, U.S. Federal Reserve Chairman Alan Greenspan, and entertainer Bob Hope.
He has done lots of good and inspired a whole generation of geeks.
side note:
that scrolling nav bar on the royal site is teh suxors!
Whats that got to do with it? He didnt have to give a penny?
Look at it percentage wise... when was the last time you donated $30 and got knighted or praised by the media? ;) $100 million isn't crap to him.
I'm not saying I'm not glad that he did donate it, because I am. I'm just saying it's not worthy of knighthood.
Now someone who is making $15,000 a year but donated $100 of it to the tsunami releif fun.. now he/she SHOULD be knighted.
Percentage wise that $100 million is leveraged to a do alot more than your $30.
The fact is that the Foundation, which Gates started in 2000, was funded by the transfer of $23 billion of his shares.
The Foundation donates a minimum of 5% (about $1 billion a year) just to maintain its charitable status.
Good on ya Bill.
And yes, he does deserve it. Far more than others who've been knighted in the past... Conrad Black comes to mind in the list of the undeserving.
The Gates Foundation hasn't just scattered money around to generate publcity, they've made highly targeted donations in large enough amounts so that other groups/agencies/NGOs have been able to set up trusts and stabilize their own annual funding,
That stability has given numerous organizations the breathing room they need to create the type of long term programs that really make a difference.
Ok, got that out of my system. Back to being crotchety.