Forum Moderators: open
I'm as anti-RIAA as the next person but this is so OBVIOUS what happened.
What should be alarming is the LIST of songs the RIAA knows the girl transfered.
If it's that easy to get such a list under civil law, how hard is it to get a list of people you've emailed,
people you IM, forums you post to, etc. on any lawyer's whim and post it for public consumption.
Using her Grandmother's credit card, is against the law. When you do things against the law, expect to get caught eventually. No matter whether any of us may, or may not, agree with that law.
Anyway, where do you see me saying anything more than I did? Oh, come on, indeed.
Still the whole thing is very silly and it is no wonder the RIAA is being taken to task for it.
(one of the the real crimes here is letting a 12 year old use a computer without supervision - as an adsense publisher it's one of my worst nightmares)
These scare tactics are not going to stop music sharing. If they pulled their heads in and stopped charging twice what Cassete's used to cost for a product that is cheaper to produce then maybe people would buy the music. At the end of the day the old "you're hurting the artist" line doesn't work as we know that artists get squat out of an album sale. People who want to support their favourite artists would help them far better by sending them $5 in the mail or going to a concert. On a $16 CD the average artists get $1 to share between them.