Forum Moderators: open

Message Too Old, No Replies

Do you think the moon landing really happened?

         

bakedjake

9:13 pm on Nov 1, 2004 (gmt 0)

WebmasterWorld Administrator 10+ Year Member Top Contributors Of The Month



Or was it just a conspiracy?

lawman

7:14 pm on Nov 25, 2004 (gmt 0)

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member Top Contributors Of The Month



Has anyone seen my brain?

Macro

7:26 pm on Nov 25, 2004 (gmt 0)

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member



lawman, OK, I have an opposite view to the view that opposite views are ignorant. An opposite to an opposite brings me over to the same side as you but overwhelming evidence that I have an opposite view in itself makes me ignorant - depending on whether you subscribe to opposite views being ignorant or not - and if I am ignorant and you and I share the same view then one of us has to take another position or we are both wise and ignorant at the same time when it is self-evident that we are not.

Where's my prozac? Dammit, where's my prozac? I want it now. Now, I said. Did you hear me?

Rugles

7:39 pm on Nov 25, 2004 (gmt 0)

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member



>>>NASA's performance of late seems ill equipped to manage a parking lot

That is a bit of a stretch.

Come now, they had what, something like a 100 or more shuttle flights. Four or Five landings on the moon. There is hundreds of satelites in orbit working perfectly. They recently landed on mars and sent back pictures and data.
I think you are focusing too closely on the few failures and ignoring the 50 years of success.

I had a flat tire a month ago, does that mean cars will never work right?

lawman

8:25 pm on Nov 25, 2004 (gmt 0)

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member Top Contributors Of The Month



Can someone please explain how the Mizar star system exhibits simultaneous red and blue shifts? Sounds like a conspiracy on a cosmic order and I don't want to take the wrong position, not than any position I take would be incorrect.

greenleaves

10:50 pm on Nov 25, 2004 (gmt 0)

10+ Year Member



ok, I am on the fence of belief/disbelief. Whoever can answer one question that has not being touched by the people who believe, get to greatly influence vote (for whatever that is worth). Here goes:

Why is the flag fluttering if there is no air or wind on the moon?

All the rest of the explanations (for believing) seem reasonable. But this question, I have not seen debunked, yet.

lawman

10:58 pm on Nov 25, 2004 (gmt 0)

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member Top Contributors Of The Month



>>Why is the flag fluttering if there is no air or wind on the moon?

The answer to your question, Grasshopper, lies in Area 51. Go there. The truth can be found in a spider hole next to the hanger housing the alien space craft.

Once you have found the definitive answer, report back with a 50 page, single-spaced, 10 point font, 1 inch margins all the way around, paper explaining the mystery. Footnotes and pictures would be helpful. :)

Now someone explain how a star system can be coming and going at the same time. I've checked
Area 51 and the answer is not there.

Rugles

11:35 pm on Nov 25, 2004 (gmt 0)

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member



>>Why is the flag fluttering if there is no air or wind on the moon?

Vibration from when it was planted.
Uneven light makes it appear to flutter.
Breeze from Armstong when he passed by it.

You pick or make up your own explanation.

RoySpencer

1:44 am on Nov 26, 2004 (gmt 0)

10+ Year Member



The flag didn't flutter. I distinctly remember at the time that they knew they had to make a horizontal bar to hold the flag out so it appeared to be blown by the wind.
I worked for NASA as an employee for 14 years, and still am lead U.S. scientist on one of NASA's satellites. And to all of the doubters I can authoritatively say....
nya-nya-nya-nya-nya...I'm not telling!

But seriously, I once was part of a panel discussion at the National Press Club, and I was talking with Sen. Chuck Hagel before we were to speak, and the first Mars rover had just landed, and he knew I worked for NASA, so we we talking about it.
Then I said, "yeah, pretty convincing, huh? You'd never know the whole thing was done on a Hollywood sound stage:, then acted like I shouldn't have said anything. He looked genuinely concerned. I'm so bad.

Teknorat

2:43 am on Nov 26, 2004 (gmt 0)

10+ Year Member



Well the flag is not fluttering- it is wobbling on the stick.

DrDoc

4:02 pm on Nov 26, 2004 (gmt 0)

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member



Maybe the next pubcon should be held on the moon...

Macro

4:07 pm on Nov 26, 2004 (gmt 0)

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member



DrDoc, no, no, no - not a debate on whether pubcon really happened.

trillianjedi

4:20 pm on Nov 26, 2004 (gmt 0)

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member



it is wobbling on the stick.

That's due to mice eating all the cheese.

Robino

7:58 pm on Nov 26, 2004 (gmt 0)

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member




Didn't Buzz Aldrin punch some dude in the face for suggesting the landing never happened?

Jon_King

8:05 pm on Nov 26, 2004 (gmt 0)

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member



On a more serious note:

>>Has anyone seen my brain?
Lawman your dry humor cracks me up. You must have been a Bob Newhart fan.

Rugles

8:33 pm on Nov 26, 2004 (gmt 0)

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member



Is that Buzz Aldrin story true?
If so, that is real funny.

digitalghost

8:34 pm on Nov 26, 2004 (gmt 0)

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member



[csicop.org...]

nickb

8:55 pm on Nov 26, 2004 (gmt 0)



Oh Boy - I think I woke some people up by mistake...

I shoud have just said "Q.E.D."

Take care now, and thanks for all the fish!

pendanticist

9:11 pm on Nov 26, 2004 (gmt 0)

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member



Were you around when that incident took place digitalghost? Awesome! When it made the news, I watched it over and over again, each time getting more tickled at his reaction!

72 years young and not about to take any crap from that individual calling him a liar!

Pow!

Right in the kisser...

Rugles

12:34 am on Nov 27, 2004 (gmt 0)

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member



You know, I can forgive him for getting violent. Because it was the greatest thing to happen to the guy. Risked his life, must be proud as can be.
Then here you have way after the fact people calling to guy a liar and a fake.

oldskool79

4:26 am on Nov 27, 2004 (gmt 0)

10+ Year Member



Whenever anything of importance happens, some conspiracy theory always pops up (JFK, Moon Landing, 9/11, etc.)

In order to pull of this conspiracy would have required a huge number of people to be involved, including all the austronauts, the cameramen, the 'set' builders, most of the people working at nasa, government officials, etc. To think that these people were able to pull this off and keep it a secret for some 40 years is highly unlikely. Our ex president couldn't even have sex with an intern without the entire world finding out.

In addition, all of the so-called 'evidence' that shows the moon landing was false is completely wrong.

[edited by: lawman at 9:51 am (utc) on Nov. 27, 2004]

DrDoc

8:24 pm on Nov 28, 2004 (gmt 0)

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member



And, regardless of technology, certain things will remain risky... Such as atmosphere re-entry.

lawman... I saw it ealier. I think someone was selling it on ebay. "Only one owner..." ;)

Liane

12:17 pm on Jan 9, 2005 (gmt 0)

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member



Sunday, July 20, 1969. I was in Vancouver Canada at the Canadian Diving Championships and they even interrupted the competition and rolled in a TV so we could all watch the moon landing.

If I recall correctly, there was a command module and a lunar module. The lunar module was docked to the command module and then separated. One astronaut (I don't remember his name) stayed in the command module and continued orbiting the moon while the others landed in the lunar module.

The Lunar module had a camera mounted on one of the legs. No big mystery how the photo of Neil Armstrong's first steps were taken! And Armstrong took the photos of Buzz Aldrin stepping down off the ladder ... if I recall.

... and the rumour that "Paul is Dead" [geocities.com] was the truth and nothing but the truth too! :)

I remember that one too and even tried to play Rubber Soul backwards.

Yeeesh ... people will take shots at anything!

Rugles

3:52 pm on Jan 9, 2005 (gmt 0)

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member



>>One astronaut (I don't remember his name) stayed in the command module

I think that was Michael Collins. I was 7 at the time but I still remember the names.

grandpa

7:12 am on Jan 10, 2005 (gmt 0)

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member Top Contributors Of The Month



I'm looking at the advanced technology we have today. How many million dollar satellites and robots have been sent into space, only to have them fail or miss their target completely?

One specific incident (to Mars) was simply a mathematical error. One engineer used metric measurements, another didn't. That sort of stuff shouldn't happen, but it does.

I still remember the huge gaff that was made about the Hubbel telescope and how the mirror was wrong.

The fellow that did the job screwed up, plain and simple. He rushed it, didn't check his work, and made poor assumptions about environmental variables. That sort of stuff shouldn't happen, but it does. My friend was forced out of retirement to hand grind the 'spectacles' that Hubble now uses. You don't want to get him started on how the original job was performed.

Going to the moon today makes little sense. It was, IMO, a necessary step to get to the point we are at today. I'm eagerly awaiting results from the Huygens Probe Mission (5 more days to Titan).

More Tang, anyone?

Lawman, did you ever find your brain on e-bay?

shigamoto

11:28 am on Jan 10, 2005 (gmt 0)

10+ Year Member



"And where, in all of these shots, are the stars? "

Try pointing a camera up in the sky and take a shot. You won't be getting any stars at all, you need higher exposure when taking photos of stars. All the pictures you see on websites and TV of different planets has taken several hours to shoot.

That is if you take a shot on the moon of a flag and a couple of astronauts you won't be getting any stars either. Of course you would get stars if you stand with the camera for several hours.

I don't think the moon landing was a conspiracy, many of the stuff they mentioned in the documentary that started this is just lack of knowledge about physics and astronomy. I'm sad for the astronauts who actually did this and don't get any credit.

garyr_h

8:19 am on Jan 14, 2005 (gmt 0)

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member



Didn't Buzz Aldrin punch some dude in the face for suggesting the landing never happened?

That he did. I laughed my ass off when I saw a clip of it.

And to clear some things up (actually some just facts)
Armstrongs first words were actually "very fine grained... almost like a powder" ;)

And also some people think Buzz Aldrin was the first off the Apollo. He was the first to enter and possibly the first off. Not only because he had a more public persona but also possibly to take the images of Neil stepping off.

As for the other image shown of Buzz and Neil perhaps the third man Michael Collins took the shots. He was the command module pilot.

I don't really believe either way. I think it is very possible that it could be fake, for the reasons listed before this and also because the pictures simply look... fake. Looks like they are playing on a stage ;)

balam

12:47 am on Jan 15, 2005 (gmt 0)

10+ Year Member



> Can someone please explain how the Mizar star system exhibits simultaneous red and blue shifts? Sounds like a conspiracy on a cosmic order [...]

I've seen some strange questions here, but never expected something like this...

You should give yourself more credit lawman, because I suspect you already know the answer. Given that you know and assumedly understand what red & blueshift is, and that you know that Mizar is a system and not a single star, you should easily understand this answer. (An overly verbose answer to be sure, but it's so all can join in the fun).

[ Mizar - a background ]

Mizar (from the Arabic Mi'Zar - "girdle" or "waistband"), the middle star in the "handle" of the constellation Ursa Major - a.k.a. the "Big Dipper" - has long been known to be a binary star system. In fact, Mizar was the first double star to be discovered, in 1650, and the first to be photographed, in 1857.

Spectroscopic observations of Mizar A (in 1889) and Mizar B (in 1908) showed that each of those stars were in fact spectroscopic binaries themselves. Thus, the Mizar star system comprises four stars in total - two spectroscopic binaries orbiting a common centre of mass, making a visual binary.

[ What is red/blueshift? ]

A quick 'n' dirty answer that substitutes sound waves for light waves...

You're standing on the side of the road and lawman, in his police car, is approaching fast, siren blaring. (For sake of argument,) lawman hears a tone of 440 Hertz (440 Hz = open A string on a guitar) while in the car. You, however, hear a higher tone of 450 Hz as he approaches. This is because the sound waves are compressed as the source of the sound moves towards you. When lawman passes and is moving away from you, you now hear a lower tone of 430 Hz. The sound waves are now being expanded. This is known as the Doppler effect.

If a light source, such as a star, is moving towards you, the light waves are compressed and are said to be blueshifted - the light moves to a higher frequency in the spectrum, towards the ultraviolet. If the light source is moving away, the light is redshifted, shifting towards the infrared.

[ To answer your question... ]

The Mizar A & B binary systems aren't statically sitting in space, they are orbiting their common centre of mass (and the separate components of each of those systems orbit their own centre of mass in turn). As they orbit, one star is moving towards the Earth, blueshifting its light while the other star moves away, redshifting its light - and that's why (virtually) all binary systems exhibit a simultaneous red & blueshift.

If anyone found this vaguely interesting, then check out this Astronomy Picture of the Day [antwrp.gsfc.nasa.gov] where you can find more info.

whoisgregg

2:04 am on Jan 15, 2005 (gmt 0)

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member



Very interesting read, balam. Thanks for putting that together I never knew that about binary systems.

vkaryl

2:40 am on Jan 15, 2005 (gmt 0)

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member



Not only interesting, balam, intriguing. Thanks for the link - pretty fascinating.

What's it called when one HEARS the red n blue bubblegum machine? I've always heard those lights - grew up in Nevada, there's a million miles of flat out there, at night you see bubblegum machines a LONG way before you get to them. I hear them.... in fact, I've got a really nice percentage of "oops I'll bet there's a cop around, I better slow it down a bit" so maybe I "hear" them even when I don't see them.... my husband says he thinks I "feel" the radar.

[Last speeding ticket: Feb 1973, on highway 93 coming back from Arizona into Vegas in a 1970 Dodge no clue what model - belonged to the then-current sigother - was running about 120; the cop was a guy I went to school with.... I got off light, he wrote me for 60+ in a 55 - which was marginally true, of course....]

lawman

6:56 am on Jan 16, 2005 (gmt 0)

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member Top Contributors Of The Month



balam, you have laid out a clear, concise, logical, and convincing answer, yet somehow, I'm sure a conspiracy exists - at least for some members of this board. ;)

vkaryl, you drive 150 mph in a modded Z and 120 in a non-descript Dodge? What are you driving now and what is your top speed in it? :)

This 96 message thread spans 4 pages: 96