include body or use header/footer

[StickeR]

Hi all, been a viewer for some time and got some decent amount of help from it.

I got a little issue:
For our new website, we've been thinking about 'templating it'.

We've done some experimants with the index and an include with links like index.php?page=example.

Now Ive also tried some things with headers and footers, but I think I like the include page better.

Here's my question which I hope anyone can clear up for me:
Which one is better? and how do searchengines handle such sites?

[jatar_k]

Welcome to WebmasterWorld in non lurker mode StickeR ;)

try this for starters
Pros/ Cons of passing parameters in URL [webmasterworld.com]

I use the header/footer version, static urls, though not static content ;)

never had an issue

[StickeR]

ojoj, funny thing.

I always try to search for verything, couldn't find nothing, so I asked, and it turned out it already was there..

Thanks though! :)

[jatar_k]

no worries, anything to get you out of lurker mode ;)