Welcome to WebmasterWorld Guest from 18.104.22.168
Forum Moderators: open
joined:Jan 8, 2003
I've got the ability to do this but as I run over 20,000 kws over 5 engines it is a big job, so I would be interested to know if anyone has done it and seen a definite financial return from the effort.
All my PPC campaigns are profitable anyway and my logic is that unless I get some "I did this and it saved me £x amount" replies then I won't bother.
I run daily/weekly/monthly reports for all my keywords and what type of cost per lead/acquisition they are generating.
Terms that are costing me more than my target I lower the bids and/or tweak the ad copy to create a more qualified click.
Terms that are well below my target I typically up the bids (if i'm not already on top) and tweak the ad copy a bit to see if I can increase the CTR (be careful with this though as you may ruin your cost per lead).
For a 20,000 keyword list I realize creating 20,000 tracking IDs is just not possible. I would imagine you have so many terms because you are doing some sort of geo targetting.
When I extensively use geo targetting for a given campaign I typically group words into "baskets". So, if I was doing 200 combinations of the keywords "*Location* Blue Widgets" (location being the term that changes, creating the 200 combinations) I assign that one basket a single referral ID.
I think this is a good way to minimize the amount of tracking IDs you need to generate which will still allow you to see how keywords as a whole convert.
Hope that helps!
joined:Feb 13, 2003
For that many KWs, I would definately use some sort of KW tracking.
If you can weed out/lower bids a few high volume, low ROI KWs, or groups of low volume KWs, and either cut them loose or make them preform, you can quickly save quite a bit of money or make more money by promoting the less effective ones in a different manner.