Forum Moderators: open
You hear all the time of technology that is able to relate content on the basis of themes / context and not keywords.
How on earth do they do this - at least without having had some poor guy sit down in the first place and at least manually map some correlation between keywords?
Just a thought...
surely on a page with
Blue WIDGET Ticket
Red WIDGET Shop
green WIDGET opinion
red WIDGET opinion
in the above the main theme would be widget, with perhaps "widget opinion" and "red widget" coming a close second.
The "theme" or "automated taxonomy" as the companies selling it like to call it, looks exactly the same to me as keyword density.
whereas:
Blue WIDGET opinion
Red WIDGET opinion
green WIDGET opinion
red WIDGET opinion
in the above the theme would be "widget opinion".
I can't work out where the complicated bit about "automated taxonomy" is.
You've highlighted this:-
Blue WIDGET Ticket
Red WIDGET Shop
green WIDGET opinion
red WIDGET opinion
Which is a cluster of words. These are three word phrases.
Within that you could use keyword density but I don't really see the point. You may as well use phrase density - it would be more relevant.
TJ
Over and above such analysis I can't see where the technology comes in to improve it - it's the whole Java Island versus Java Programming argument.
How would you get it to categories it automatically other then using keyword density?
When I referred to keyword density I meant density of keywords, whether as a phrase or single keyword (exactly as if you used a keyword desnity analyser when optimising a website).
But your example actually doesn't do that does it?
The words "red", "widget" and "Ticket" and "shop" could appear elsewhere in the page without appearing together (non-target phrase).
If you just analysed the page you would get misleading results.
Your example answered your own question. In making the example you grouped the words into phrases.
TJ