Welcome to WebmasterWorld Guest from 188.8.131.52
Forum Moderators: open
<blockquote><font size="1" face="Veranda, Arial"></font>
1:3349 download 1:2614: online
2:2767 online 2:1959: download
3:2608 mp3 3:1852: lyrics
4:2016 music 4:1768: music
5:1791 games 5:1615: internet
6:1770 lyrics 6:1606: map
7:1761 internet 7:1560: info
8:1682 sitescope 8:1524: games
9:1536 software 9:1401: mp3
10:1527 car 10:1357: picture
11:1417 computer 11:1329: car
12:1415 cheats 12:1319: history
13:1358 game 13:1287: software
14:1300 search 14:1284: world
15:1180 pokemon 15:1274: state
Don't get me wrong - you're doing a great job, and there's no arguing with "FREE!". But "free" isn't everything, of course, except for those who can't or won't afford a commercial solution: verifiability is just as important if you're working within a professional framework, e.g. if you want to advise clients to opt for one keyword phrase rather than another, and if you want to show them why you're saying so.
And if Free isn't good enough, show me a better kw system (free or pay) and within 60days, this system will be better.
Phrases will be added shortly (some time this week), and I will be doing the 'relative strength' thing, and the 'keyword suggestion'...etc.
Again: not knocking your stuff, but I'd suppose you'd agree that there's a big difference whether you're
referencing AltaVista and Inktomi or Kanoodle and GoTo, to give a random example (not implying you are doing either!) - or, make that "Major Player #1 + Major Player #2" versus "Minor Player #1 + Minor Player #2", if you will.