Forum Moderators: open

Message Too Old, No Replies

Overstuffing keywords?

         

kosar

5:57 pm on Jul 2, 2004 (gmt 0)

10+ Year Member



if i have a descrip: we are the number 1 source for widgets, blue widgets, green widgets and yellow widgets.
and
keywords; blue widgets, green widgets, yellow widgets
on the same page. is this too much?

troels nybo nielsen

3:40 pm on Jul 4, 2004 (gmt 0)

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member



Most search engines have put little or no weight on meta tags for the last couple of years.

For me the point in writing a description is that some search engines sometimes show it in their SERPs. I write a sentence or two or three with a short and precise description of what is on the page. The most important keywords are there but mostly only once.

Meta keywords are really almost useless. I write a few words, sometimes only one. I don't repeat them. No use. And it might trigger some filter if other factors are close to an edge.

kosar

2:09 pm on Jul 6, 2004 (gmt 0)

10+ Year Member



then is there a real importance in keywords anymore?

swiftshot

2:37 pm on Jul 6, 2004 (gmt 0)

10+ Year Member



then is there a real importance in keywords anymore

Absolutely! But to be sure we're talking the same thing here, it's the META keyword tag that's gone the way of the dinosaur. Still have it in your code, just don't obsess over it. Some SEs do use it, but not the big name ones.

Focus on putting your keywords in your copy. What benefits your visitors will benefit the spiders.

jetboy_70

2:42 pm on Jul 6, 2004 (gmt 0)

10+ Year Member



Didn't Yahoo state that meta keywords were a ranking criteria when Yahoo Search was launched? I'm not looking to start a 'my site ranks #1 in Yahoo without them' discussion, just confirmation that I didn't imagine this.

swiftshot

3:05 pm on Jul 6, 2004 (gmt 0)

10+ Year Member



Haven't read that article. I was just relaying what I've heard from a number of forums. It's possible Yahoo's doing something different, and for sure Google doesn't use them (meta keywords, that is).

Could you provide a link to the article you read?

kosar

3:53 pm on Jul 6, 2004 (gmt 0)

10+ Year Member



so its more intent to use your keywords as content rather than in the metta tag correct?

buckworks

4:04 pm on Jul 6, 2004 (gmt 0)

WebmasterWorld Administrator 10+ Year Member Top Contributors Of The Month



Didn't Yahoo state that meta keywords were a ranking criteria when Yahoo Search was launched?

I can't give a link, but one place Yahoo said this was at the Search Engine Strategies conference in New York in March, when Yahoo Search was a brand new baby.

They didn't indicate how much weight the meta keywords would be given, but did say their algo would look at them.

swiftshot

6:05 pm on Jul 6, 2004 (gmt 0)

10+ Year Member



so its more intent to use your keywords as content rather than in the metta tag correct?

Yes, focus more on what your content says, than the meta tag. I haven't read the article referenced above, but I do know that the majority of SEOs will tell you that great content will produce great results (that, and other factors, some of which are in and out of your control). I know, kind of vague, but SEO is more an art than a science at this point.

Select the keywords you want to target for a page of your site, and include them in the content for that page. Do the same thing for each page of your site, but with keywords specific to the content relevant to the page in question.

telemecus

2:18 pm on Jul 12, 2004 (gmt 0)

10+ Year Member



So, is it safe to say that if meta keywords have 'gone the way of the dinosarus', then keyword spamming is now irrelevant? I ask this because a certain local seo is top of the rankings and uses numerous k1,k2,k3 keyphrases in the meta keywords section, where k1,k2 is repeated about a dozen times. Hasn't harmed his rankings in the G.