Forum Moderators: open
But in real life it is a bit different. It's a good rule of thumb that for every single competent webmaster who uses a keyword there will be several thousands who are incompetent.
So all in all Nick's comment sums it up very precisely.
-------
If you want to compete on competitive keywords it takes lots of hard work. Basically there are two different ways:
1. Create lots of quality content that is easily accessible for search engines' spiders. That takes a lot of work by you or someone else.
2. Get to know a lot about how to cheat search engines. That proces takes work too. And it's dangerous.
----
I'm not so sure that search engines hate frames. But lots of human users do.
Oh, and welcome to WebmasterWorld!
The question I asked was if SE's dont rank pages well that use cloaking, frames or Redirection.....and Flash
Then why does my local band get #1 of say....a site for band known worldwide. To be more specific.
Stuff happens...
Oh, it is not what I would consider a competitive term. No money in it that I know of, and little if any competition. Doesn't generate much traffic either.
WBF
I have no idea how my question relates to weather my site is for money making purposes.What that question was getting at is whether the search terms (keywords) you were talking about were "competitive." What that means, simply enough, is that a significant number of people are actively competing for them.
For the most part the stiffest competition is over keyword phrases that bring searchers that will spend money. Site operators chasing those terms spend time learning how to optimize well, and pay other experts to do it for them. Further, there tend to be a large number of sites attempting to get traffic for profitable keywords.
If you're in one of those areas, you have to play the game very well to beat out a million or more other pages, at least a few hundred of them very well optimized, going after the same searchers you're looking for. If you're not in one of those competitive areas, your task is much easier... and you get away with doing some things that might not be successful otherwise.
The question I asked was if SE's dont rank pages well that use cloaking, frames or Redirection.....and FlashMost likely because that band's site, their reknown notwithstanding, is not well optimized for the keywords you think they're chasing.
Then why does my local band get #1 of say....a site for band known worldwide.
Count yourself lucky, and if that position is important to you... don't tell them. :)
Im happy with the position I have now, Is there a certain key to getting a higher position in the more competative keyword that generates 1,430,000 sites?
Or does it all have to do with how many pages on my site have relevant content to that specific keyword?