Forum Moderators: open
Let's say there are two new pages, X and Y. X is optimized perfectly for a major search engine, but receives little traffic over a 6 month period.
Page Y isn't optimized at all, but through other means (enewsletters, affiliate programs etc), receives a ton of views.
Which page would climb the ranks first?
Other stuff - site stature, site age, link popularity, on page optimization, theming, etc - will push a site further up the rankings faster than *any* amount of usage data / if it is being included.
<added>
*cough*
Which page would climb the ranks first?
I believe that was the question - not whether traffis is important or not but rather -> does website usage help a site climb the rankings.
Unless I missed something? :)
</added>
In general, traffic is not factor that is used by search engines to determine relevancy for any given search term.
That being said, in the past and perhaps in the future engines have used click-thru counters and use that data to some degree in determining relevancy.
So in these cases traffic did influence the sites position in the SERP, but only traffic that was coming through that SERP.
click....hangup....click....hangup
But the high traffic site would obviously get more backlinks than the low traffic site. And finally those more backlinks would have an influence to the ranking of that page.
NN
[google.com...]
That means google has tracked the clickthru and hence knows by sample size how much traffic you are getting from them.