Welcome to WebmasterWorld Guest from 54.224.253.82

Forum Moderators: mademetop

Message Too Old, No Replies

To optimise or not bother?

to optimise or not

     
1:33 pm on Mar 4, 2003 (gmt 0)

Junior Member

10+ Year Member

joined:Dec 30, 2002
posts:71
votes: 0


I've been reading a great lately about SE Opt., both here at WebmasterWorld and elsewhere.

It seems to me that some sites are almost defying what the experts are saying and get #1 listings regardless.

Take this site for eg. example.com
(I am nothing to do with this site whatsoever)

It has no meta tag keywords to speak of except for its name. It has no h1 tag (css styled h) and yet it is listed as the first site when I search for website design.

I am not an expert but I've seen many sites that seem to defy all i read about the subject.

antipodes

[edited by: heini at 1:47 pm (utc) on Mar. 4, 2003]
[edit reason] please, no urls / thanks [/edit]

ppg

1:50 pm on Mar 4, 2003 (gmt 0)

Full Member

10+ Year Member

joined:Mar 14, 2002
posts:328
votes: 0


what are its inbound links like?
2:03 pm on Mar 4, 2003 (gmt 0)

Preferred Member

10+ Year Member

joined:Aug 11, 2002
posts:481
votes: 0


"To optimise or not bother?"

If a site has the right content and has been put together properly it may not need to be optimised :)

Personally I think optimisation is a good thing to do, you may already have a gret site but spending a little bit of extra time can only help improve things further.

My 2 penneth :)

3:12 pm on Mar 4, 2003 (gmt 0)

Junior Member

10+ Year Member

joined:Dec 30, 2002
posts:71
votes: 0


I don't know the inbound links situation but this site (like so many others:) is barely optimised if at all really. I appreciate links may have some role in this, but not links alone surely.

I am seeing a number of these sites as i take a look around. I wonder how much seo need is artifical.

I will continue looking at this subject.

antipodes

3:31 pm on Mar 4, 2003 (gmt 0)

Senior Member

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member

joined:Apr 21, 2001
posts:2489
votes: 0


optimaization does not have to equal spam.

Content is King, and the content interspersed across, an appropriate (easily crawled) navigational structure will always do well, and then loads of links to strengthen it.

The days of Meta's, H1's, etc. are dying. Their's probably life to squeze out of them yet, but i would'nt use them as a strategy to get high ranks.

3:42 pm on Mar 4, 2003 (gmt 0)

Preferred Member

10+ Year Member

joined:Mar 23, 2001
posts:402
votes: 0


very strange - doesn't seem to have any inbound links and the PR is only 4.

I'd be pretty interested to know more about how this has happened.

3:52 pm on Mar 4, 2003 (gmt 0)

Senior Member

WebmasterWorld Senior Member jimbeetle is a WebmasterWorld Top Contributor of All Time 10+ Year Member

joined:Oct 26, 2002
posts:3292
votes: 6


I've found that for these 'mystery' sites doing a link.all on alltheweb is much more effective than Google. You might find a boatload of backlinks with good keywords in the linktext. That quite often answers the Why.

In these same mystery cases I've often noticed that many of the pages the backlinks were on also had the keywords in the title and elsewhere on the page, leading me to believe (not confirm) that Google might give more weight to these links.

Jim

3:56 pm on Mar 4, 2003 (gmt 0)

Senior Member

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member

joined:Apr 21, 2001
posts:2489
votes: 0


Also for search terms, just becuase you've got low PR, does'nt mean you can't rank #1, this is a fallacy.
5:01 pm on Mar 4, 2003 (gmt 0)

Senior Member

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member

joined:Apr 21, 2001
posts:2489
votes: 0


Go back to the base url, PR 6, same company. 38 inbound links. Good directory listings.

The page is a doorfront. Targetting a specific term, site may even have hundred, and how says spam is dead.

 

Join The Conversation

Moderators and Top Contributors

Hot Threads This Week

Featured Threads

Free SEO Tools

Hire Expert Members