Welcome to WebmasterWorld Guest from 188.8.131.52
Forum Moderators: mademetop
As things stand they are dependent on other sites to drive traffic to their PPC listings. This reduces their margins and also introduces dependencies on others users. By establishing themselves as a great search engine in their own right they could build a good user base with some marketing making the most of all the brands they have.
I am hoping that OV would like to be considered a good search facility in terms of returning a large number of relevant results to achieve the above reason. I think it would be great if OV used AV and Fast technology to establish a first rate algo - allowing free inclusion along side PFI and perhaps incorporate the PPC listings along the lines of Google ad-words - so the pure search results don't start down on page 4.
I can't really see them doing that as it would only really bring level with Google, not actually offer much new, but in my opinion it would be a step in the right direction.
Nothing's really changed.
Let's just hope M$ doesnt come along and by them all up. They have a history of letting other people come up with ideas...then they come in and buy up a great idea and turn it into a mediocre one. I don't think having to sign in with a Passport account to use a search engine is a good thing for all of us...lots of security/tracking issues there with a company with a VERY poor track record in that respect.
joined:Jan 30, 2002
I guess the last few weeks brings a few of those "SE moral type" threads that come up on WW now and again. How much does SERP quality matter when companies are buying each other out left right and centre. Most of the reasons are nothing to do with SERP quality, more to do with the forces of business.
Google at the mo undoubtedly has the best setup for delivering quality results (the non-paid ones anyway), and the only thing that could stand in their way right now is the forces of businesss, and not the quality of SERP's. To me, google looks alot more vulnerable "from the outside", but in regards to me being a user, its still the #1, and in regards to getting traffic, its #1 referrer for many people too.
I think the "steel cage match" could and should get ugly......theres more room for change before the "perfect" results are delivered :)
I think the non-commercial content web is being left even further behind.
My hope was that AlltheWeb would challenge Google in this arena leading to better and more useful methods for searching.
The big question is how long does Google keep their "user first" view of spidering and results going?
joined:Feb 8, 2002
With Google, you have the best of CPC and Search Results and a great BRAND that is virtually unstoppable in the near future and if you ask me contagious!.
OV seems to be FEELING the pressue and making the steps/moves of an eclipsing company does;) to help muddle the financial numbers with a bunch of acquisitions and go belly up!.
Criticism welcome; tell me if you see any mistakes. If anyone wants a larger image maybe I'll put it up.
joined:Nov 11, 2000
Is it possible that Overture will dump the free submissions at both AV and ATW, leaving only PFI at both, in an attempt to increase revenue.
Doesn't make sense to me. The FTC would be all over them.
I didn't see any links for InfoSpace or are you calling them dead?
IMHO, the little guy is on life support and the prognosis is not good. Maybe 6 months tops, then well... unless you got the money honey, the dance is over.
Something "super machine" like is going to have to step up or it's lights out for Mom and Pop.
I didn't see any links for InfoSpace or are you calling them dead?
Its there, on the bottom right: InfoSpace along with Dogpile, Excite, Metacrawler, and WebCrawler
I didn't include everything of course; iWon isn't there, nor is Zeal's search even though I included Zeal listings and software. I don't think I excluded anything of much importance though.
they make 100% rev on more of their PPC now, not just a percentage. ...the Yahoo situation is the most interesting .. how they handle that will be v interesting.
I see 4 players in the future - Y! Google and OV, all with pretty close to the same model that Google pioneered.
So, while the directories and engines are self important today, they are going to be changing form in the near future to become vendors for these new applications.
N00b spoken here. This is my first post anywhere on this subject.
As far as dedicated search engines go, MSN does not really rate as it is still really a sub brand, same for AOL. Ask Jeeves is getting bigger but is an odds-on for merging into one of the 3 biggies any time soon. This is of course all conjecture!
My key point though which im 100% sure of, is that this is NOT the start of the end of the non-commercial web. It fact it may well be a good thing, with the web promotion moving fast to the end reality - that if you are selling something commercial on the Web yes you do will need to pay, but if you are offering something free, substantive, uniqiue,and useful yes, the non-commercial web just got smarter.
Its all about grabbing eyeballs by providing a non-commercial highly useful search tool for people looking for info, and displaying your ads completely separate "down the side" for people who are looking for commercial solutions. Its what Google has done for a year or so, and what Y! is showing strong signs of doing, and Im pretty sure what Overture is going to do. Google started off as a pure search engines and added PPC on the side. Overture started as a PPC service provider and will add pure search as their own fully owned portals/search engine.In the end i think the basic models of all 3 will be pretty similar in principle though of course significant differences in look and format and delivery.
You could go to the home page of AV for example and you could then choose to have only commercial results or free results with ads.
It may even be possible to put the two results side by side on the results page.
That way searchers could if they are wanted go to only those companies that are paying the engine.
joined:Feb 8, 2002
If OV was under such a pressure from Google Adwords Select (which I believe it is ..), the best OV could have done it getting bought by Google (essentially selling off their remaining distribution channels)!.
Now with the recent moves by OV, it has made a lot easier for G to move and close in on deals with current/remaining OV distribution channels ...!
That's why Overture paid about $200,000,000 to provide free search.....I don't think so...One thing we could be sure...Free is over or overture.
And so will be overture.
Have to respectfully disagree.
Who would go to a commercial search? The reach is very limited. Only those looking to buy something.
Who goes to overture.com?
Thats why they needed to buy some general "free" type properities.. to compete with Google you need to offer something for the vast majority of people on the web who are looking for info. The only model that really works is to sell "off the side" or top, or bottom, or wherever. you have to get those eyeballs before you start selling. Its well wirth their investment to get 100% of the PPC revenue from Fast and AV rather than just a percentage, and synergise all these things together with the smart guys they just bought, and this was the only way to make a challenge to Google.
Im not saying they will keep the AV and Fast or ATW brands, they may do so, they may create another completely dfferent mainstream search engine for cobbling it altogether and doing some extra work to make it special.
Bootom Line. You CAN have a search engine that is completely moneitized or comemrcially oriented - but your reach will never even get close to Google. And there are other "clean searches" still bubbling at the bottom - Teoma, Wisenut, Look etc, are all waiting in the wings for an opprotunity. The fact is there will always be a mass need for free submission relevance only based index, and Google has proven you can make a cash return on it.
Again, this may well be GOOD for free submission engines, if only for those with primarily non-commercial and content filled sites.
1. Why the SE's try so many tricks to embed their ads in the SERPS and to hide the differences.
2. Why SE's that get too desperate for money only end up cutting off the legs of their business.
3. Why crawled search cannot be eliminated.
4. Why SEO will continue to be a fruitful activity.
5. Why SE's will continue to attempt to undercut and marginalize SEO activity.
joined:Sept 20, 2000
I feel we could be seeing the emergence of two things, a free search similar to google and a commercial search.
We have that already Google (free) and MSN (all ads).
Within Google we have it also - Google and Froogle.
I think Overture is desparate, two dropped deals and they are toast. They don't even have to be dropped, just pushed to give up even more or the syndication take. With LS floating around MSN and MSN featured listings, and Inktomi still in the picture, MSN can just about name the percentage they want from Overture results.
YAHOO! probably could as well if they fiddle with Inktomi a little bit.
Almost nobody (in the US anyway) uses AltaVista or FAST for anything as measured by the percentage of referrals in the logs of most sites. That is not going to change just because Overture now owns them.
If those results suddenly started appearing on MSN or AOL and were branded FALOVER or what ever the new combo is called then they might see an increase in marketshare. People are lazy, unless there is a compelling reason to leave Google why would anyone currently using them who doesn't really care as long as they find what they want go anywhere else.
Maybe Overture admires AV and their business strategy. Start out doing one thing and doing it really well. Get distracted and try to go "portalize", then crash, then burn, then stagger around for a while, then get acquired for peanuts.
If every engine out there today went pay for something, it would be big news at least in the online media and a new kid on the block would get a ton of free PR and buzz, as well as a boost in popularity.
Like someone else said in another thread, one company not very good at search bought another company not very good at search and even worse at business strategy. Then snapped up another engine that might be ok at search.
And google has just lost the race for a couple of propsective partners for Adwords.
I agree with Chiyo. Few people want to search advertisements. People want to search information.
I agree, too. That's exactly why Google is so popular. People who are looking for INFORMATION go to Google because it simply provides the most RELEVANT results. For example, if you do a search for "configuring computer program xyz", you don't want the SERPs be filled with titles like "BUY PROGRAM XYZ HERE", "CHEAPEST PRICES FOR XYZ CDS" or something. In this case a small hobby site hosted by a free webhost may provide the most useful information, not the guys that spend $$$ for getting on the SERPs.
The other search engines can try making money with PFI and stuff, but if nobody uses their search, it'll be pretty hard to make money. And nobody will use their search if they don't provide relevant results when people search for INFORMATION.
I've heard many non-tech people saying "I don't use anything but Google. With Google, I can find what I'm looking for. The other search engines deliver just crap."
That's why I don't see anybody threatening Google for a while, no matter how much money they spend.
I am personally going to keep a very close watch on the way things will pan out in the next few months, with a possible scenario whereby SEO becomes just a complimentary, rather than key standalone channel, for a clients wider e-marketing/promotional strategy.
The proposition and channels for a site being returned following an information search based on 'relevance and quality of information' against 'the highest bidder' is becoming narrower and narrower :(
joined:Sept 20, 2000
Long term, Overture's best prospects might be working with news sites and others that get a respectable amount of traffic but nowhere near what MSN or YAHOO! gets - CNN, News.com, abcnews.com, Internet.com stuff like that.
If there's an extra hundred million (or maybe even a few) to be made by YAHOO! or MSN by taking PPC inhouse, Findwhat or other smaller PPC vendors could be acquisition targets. Then OV is stuck with 2 engines without any traffic, its own search results that can't stand alone, takes a major hit in revenue, and doesn't have the cash to build tech or brand for it's new toys.
Will MS buy ASK for Teoma & FAST? Might do so. Will it buy Overture? It should, makes sense. Then it will have the equal of Google: great results + paid listings.
We will then see a tri-polar order:
Google - MSN - Yahoo
In terms of pure search, I see Yahoo going nowehere. Yahoo has features such as finance, shopping, mail etc. that prompt usage, but search is a "thing" in it's own. So, Yahoo will probably falter somewhere.
I also expect another search engine to come up sometime soon. The rules of the market say that whenever somebody is making a lot of profits, another player will come-in and try and muscle a share of it.
2006: GOogle-MSN-New Player
I think M$N will get closer to Look$mart (who also - don't forget - own Wi$enut).
Then we'd have
And we've already got the Overture/FAST-alltheweb/Altavista entity - which should now be rebranded
But seriously - why wouldn't MSN look to its existing business relationships for a solution first - rather than just running off and buying someone else? Is that what we all do with existing suppliers everyday?
(one day my first thought will be ...opportunity, as it should be :))
Then I thought, Where are the customers?
Ans: mostly at Google. How can Overture get hold of them now?
2 Better results
They can try both, but Google can do that too.
The little Guy can still do OK. Look at the worst current scenario, sites that have been taken over by corporates, eg aol Shopping. The results are awful, the prices high, and often, to compete, you have to make a big loss on your first sale as a merchant. Bad news.
But how many people shop there?
How many will shop there in 12 months time?
Just those happy with Kays and Argos. (UK only, read cheap catalogues, with a declining market). A market for sure, but not all of it.
It has been said many times, people search for information. Google works, this will not shift the balance.
The Steel cage match is not about any of those named (Yahoo, Google, AskJeeves, and Overture). It is about whether any of the contenders named can survive against MS. My opinion is they can't.....money talks and MS has more spare cash than the rest have in Market Cap.
Microsoft's spare $40 billion will buy them all at current stock prices and leave $28 billion over for something else!
Prediction: Bill is going on a shopping spree once he is convinced the market has hit a low, which should be sometime shortly after the Iraq issue is determined.