Forum Moderators: open
what do you tell clients with a question like this? My track record speaks for itself, and I can show before and after figures for other clients, but I dont know how to guesstimate an actual figure...
any idea's??
You can finagle a guestimate by using what you really expect from the paid options, and you'll just have to use your "gut" for the rest.
How well are they situated right now? How aggressive are the tactics their competition deploy? Is there an upward trend in the product category? A seasonal one? All these would have to be factored in, and at the end, its a "dart toss", like picking stocks.
I would never put a traffic figure into writing. Too many variables.
Managing the clients expectations is one of the toughest parts of this profession.
I cannot answer your question as I do not believe anyone could as a factual statement ;)
Too many variable from everything including: product or service,competition,season of the year, etc.....
One bit of advice. I would "NOT" pay for inclusion to INK, Fast/Lycos, Altavista etc unless they have very deep pockets and can pay to submit their entire site. Otherwise they will neglect any of the content on the non-paid pages of the site. You are better off getting links from some sites that do well in those SE's and be spidered/crawled deeply.
My 2-cents
Edited: I see bigjohnt beat me to it, of course I am only using one hand typing since I broke my wrist and thumb :)
[edited by: dstanovic at 10:19 pm (utc) on June 3, 2002]
[edited by: bigjohnt at 10:31 pm (utc) on June 3, 2002]
For Google, utilize their Google Adwords tool to get number of searches per day and per month for each of your target keywords. After you get the total number of searches per month for all of your target keywords, there are a few things to keep in mind. The competitiveness of each keyword is one thing that must be remembered. If you can foresee that a certain keyword(s) will be easy to obtain a top 3 ranking, than the estimated conversion rate will be higher than the rest of the more competitive keywords.
Take the total number of searches per month for each keyword and apply the estimated conversion rate. This will result in a very rough estimate of traffic that will be obtained for your keyword, or keyword list. While this is a rough estimate, with the right research, track record or history of results obtained, the estimate can become closer and closer.
This can also be done with Wordtracker for the other search engines.
There are obviously many, many variables that play a role in a calculation like this one, but, if the potential client wants to see a number or a "guesstimate", this is one of the solutions.
<added> It always helps to put the projected increase in search engine traffic in a nice graphical layout that they can look at. </added>
[edited by: agerhart at 3:22 am (utc) on June 4, 2002]
I wonder... how do print advertisers, for example, come up with any ROI figures? Ditto for other media.
There are threads on the board, by the way, about experiences people have had with Google Adwords... perhaps some of the other PPCs too.
I don't know what you might say about crawler-based engines. You might conceivably be able to do it after the fact for specific clients, but most won't release that kind of information. I feel it's completely impossible to generalize. I'm not even sure how you could give a range. And what would best case mean? Probably not much....
>>If you can foresee that a certain keyword(s) will be easy to obtain a top 3 ranking, than the estimated conversion rate will be higher than the rest of the more competitive keywords.<<
agerhart - Are you taking this from the study quoted by Overture? If you are, I've always been slightly suspicious of that study, because of Overture's desire to sell top three spots, which generally go for a lot more than the rest. I have no facts to back up my doubt... just a feeling.
I would advise you to never put a number of any sort on a contract and over emphasize the fact that any number you give them is a very rough guess and there isn't anything concrete to back the numbers up.