Forum Moderators: open
I likewise think they bought an established base of web development designers, the Dreamweaver base... Buying the user base is cheaper than trying to convince designers that Photoshop and Illustrator are web development programs.
They have made the right choice and will entirely promote Dreamweaver/Fireworks as the future of web development. IMHO
I would beg to disagree limbo about Fireworks. I think the Adobe web suite will be the Macromedia product line.I likewise think they bought an established base of web development designers, the Dreamweaver base... Buying the user base is cheaper than trying to convince designers that Photoshop and Illustrator are web development programs.
They have made the right choice and will entirely promote Dreamweaver/Fireworks as the future of web development. IMHO
God, let's hope so! I'm so entrenched in the Macromedia tool set. Aside from Acrobat, it's been so long since I've used Adobe products regularly that every time I fire up Photoshop or Illustrator I'm lost beyond the basics. To me, Adobe products are more for print than web.
There's never a bad time to purchase Dreamweaver. ;)
I have always thought that Fireworks was brilliantly interfaced and was intuitive. especially the way it handles a mix match of vectors and rasters, but it falls down on perfomance, effects, acuracy and is very lousy at handling fonts IMO.
I suppose whatever happens we can hope that 'they' build us a web graphic tool that amalgamates the strengths of both PS and FW.
Photoworks... Fireshop...
Photoshop is a superior product but for completely different reasons and IMO does not compete with FW. Adobe = print, web = Macromedia