Forum Moderators: not2easy
Just wondering if anyone has had any experience with this.
So there is a chance for some protection out there - but not much. And developing that kind of intellectual property can be expensive and time consuming (you need a patent attorney, etc.).
I do know people have sent cease & desists to those who have copied their site layout (right down to the identical code) and had the "infringing" website change the layout due to this. But I don't believe it would stand up if the "infringer" took the C&D to a lawyer familiar with internet related law, or if it went to court.
I'm convinced that at least half of the time that things like content and images are stolen, they're done so without the consent of that company's upper management. Time and time again, when we've brought these type of things to the attention of the "higher-ups," we've gotten them resolved. In fact, I can only think of one case (out of maybe 10 or 12) that we weren't able to resolve it this way.
Lazy designers? Lazy writers? Lazy project managers? Who knows. But my experience points to these things being fairly simple to resolve, if you try.
Lazy designers? Lazy writers? Lazy project managers?
I think this is right on the money. This is one of the reasons that content and website template sites do such a brisk business.
In my experience with copyright infringers stealing from my own sites, it comes down to one thing... laziness. It is a lot of work to create a significant amount of content, or a great web design, and most people just assume they will never get caught because the web is so vast. They were just unlucky enough to steal from me, since I actively hunt out infringers, and have other members of my own community alert me to copycats on the loose ;)
Another factor aside from laziness is also quality. They can't design as well, or write as well, so they steal to impress the "higher-ups" within the company. That obviously backfires when you steal from Hawkgirl, too ;)
If someone takes and uses another site's actual html code, then that's part of what I refer to as content. That is copyrighted. I agree those who do this tend to be lazy. However, many web designers also get their ideas from other sites and will copy portions of a look without taking the code. In those cases, I believe it's fair game.