Welcome to WebmasterWorld Guest from 54.198.183.217

Forum Moderators: open

Message Too Old, No Replies

The FAST WebCrawler Army

in fully coordinated attack mode

     
4:15 am on Feb 3, 2002 (gmt 0)

Senior Member

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member

joined:Aug 10, 2001
posts:1551
votes: 10


66.77.73.72 - - [01/Feb/2002:16:41:05 -0500] "GET /robots.txt HTTP/1.0" 200 183 "-" "FAST-WebCrawler/3.3 (crawler@fast.no; http_://fast.no/support.php?c=faqs/crawler)"
66.77.73.83 - - [01/Feb/2002:16:45:36 -0500] "GET /robots.txt HTTP/1.0"...
66.77.73.85 - - [01/Feb/2002:16:48:27 -0500] "GET /robots.txt HTTP/1.0"...
66.77.73.84 - - [01/Feb/2002:16:54:46 -0500] "GET /robots.txt HTTP/1.0"...
66.77.73.87 - - [01/Feb/2002:17:06:18 -0500] "GET /robots.txt HTTP/1.0"...
66.77.73.81 - - [01/Feb/2002:17:06:52 -0500] "GET /robots.txt HTTP/1.0"...
66.77.73.86 - - [01/Feb/2002:17:11:03 -0500] "GET /robots.txt HTTP/1.0"...
66.77.73.78 - - [01/Feb/2002:17:12:32 -0500] "GET /robots.txt HTTP/1.0"...
66.77.73.80 - - [01/Feb/2002:17:12:43 -0500] "GET /robots.txt HTTP/1.0"...
66.77.73.82 - - [01/Feb/2002:17:16:05 -0500] "GET /robots.txt HTTP/1.0"...
66.77.73.77 - - [01/Feb/2002:17:20:46 -0500] "GET /robots.txt HTTP/1.0"...
66.77.73.73 - - [01/Feb/2002:17:21:06 -0500] "GET /robots.txt HTTP/1.0"...
66.77.73.75 - - [01/Feb/2002:17:45:32 -0500] "GET /robots.txt HTTP/1.0"...
66.77.73.74 - - [01/Feb/2002:18:00:15 -0500] "GET /robots.txt HTTP/1.0"...
66.77.73.79 - - [01/Feb/2002:18:07:35 -0500] "GET /robots.txt HTTP/1.0"...
66.77.73.76 - - [01/Feb/2002:18:34:41 -0500] "GET /robots.txt HTTP/1.0"...

And that was only the beginning.

After that, they all started crawling my site, on an average half a dozen pages per minute, probably well past midnight, where my current log file ends. Looks like each one of those 16 robots fetched every single HTML document from my site seperately.

I wonder if they will now rank my site cumulatively in exchange? ;)

4:49 pm on Feb 3, 2002 (gmt 0)

Junior Member

10+ Year Member

joined:Feb 4, 2003
posts:150
votes: 0


Me2

Yesterday, 020202, 12 individual FAST servers (66.77.73.*) made 12 visits to one of my little sites and each of the 12 FAST servers went to nearly half of my entire site. Is this normal behaviour for FAST or should I put in a command in robots.txt?

Pg Req Date ISP
272: 272: 6.97%: 2/Feb/02 04:51: 66.77.73.73
272: 272: 6.97%: 2/Feb/02 10:14: 66.77.73.74
272: 272: 6.97%: 2/Feb/02 07:32: 66.77.73.75
38: 38: 0.74%: 2/Feb/02 12:01: 66.77.73.76
272: 272: 6.97%: 2/Feb/02 04:35: 66.77.73.77
282: 282: 7.21%: 2/Feb/02 13:08: 66.77.73.78
270: 270: 6.92%: 2/Feb/02 03:41: 66.77.73.80
272: 272: 6.97%: 2/Feb/02 03:33: 66.77.73.81
270: 270: 6.92%: 2/Feb/02 04:25: 66.77.73.82
283: 283: 7.05%: 2/Feb/02 05:40: 66.77.73.83
38: 38: 0.74%: 2/Feb/02 07:12: 66.77.73.84
272: 272: 6.97%: 2/Feb/02 06:28: 66.77.73.85
272: 272: 6.97%: 2/Feb/02 04:33: 66.77.73.86
272: 272: 6.97%: 2/Feb/02 04:16: 66.77.73.87

2:52 pm on Feb 6, 2002 (gmt 0)

Senior Member

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member

joined:Jan 8, 2002
posts:993
votes: 0


Fast spent over four hours on my site last night. Visited hundreds of pages. Wish it could produce some significant traffic.
11:46 am on Feb 8, 2002 (gmt 0)

Preferred Member

10+ Year Member

joined:Mar 27, 2001
posts:392
votes: 0


FAST took 104 pages last night....

stephen baker

6:35 pm on Feb 8, 2002 (gmt 0)

Inactive Member
Account Expired

 
 


Hi, this is Stephen from FAST.

One of our engineers was testing the performance of a new feature using a
test-cluster of 16 crawler machines. Unfortunately, he forgot to configure
the crawlers to divide the work between them, so they all acted independetly
and effectively all crawler were crawling all webservers. We got some
feedback on this quite quickly and the configuration error was then
corrected.

Sorry for the convenience and thanks for the feedback!

7:55 pm on Feb 8, 2002 (gmt 0)

Preferred Member

10+ Year Member

joined:Mar 27, 2001
posts:392
votes: 0


Welcome Stephen
Thanks for keeping us informed.