Forum Moderators: DixonJones
crawl-66-249-64-44.googlebot.com - - [03/Mar/2005:20:11:33 -0800] "GET / HTTP/1.0" 200 - "-" "Googlebot/2.1 (+http://www.google.com/bot.html)"
lj2420.inktomisearch.com - - [03/Mar/2005:20:17:35 -0800] "GET /robots.txt HTTP/1.0" 200 2004 "-" "Mozilla/5.0 (compatible; Yahoo! Slurp; [help.yahoo.com...]
lj2256.inktomisearch.com - - [03/Mar/2005:20:17:35 -0800] "GET /Blah_blah.html HTTP/1.0" 200 7338 "-" "Mozilla/5.0 (compatible; Yahoo! Slurp; [help.yahoo.com...]Straight outta Google 2400 E. Bayshore Parkway City: Mountain View
This is a scoop, nothing less.
(pure speculation: Could this be a licencing agreement between Y! and G about spidering capacity - Gbot essentially being an "engine" for Slurp?)
I've got to take another close look at those log files now. I've just been through one for one day with 40 different Slurp IPs, all Yahoo ones.
I, apparently, was as tired when posting as you were when reading. LOL...
No claus, it was simply too late to edit after I realized I'd pasted too much in there.
My host server switched the way visitors are portrayed in my access_log files from, what I'll call, pure IP Numbers to what you see represented. This particular entry was the very beginnings of the switchover and I inadvertantly copied the Google line as well. The sub-comment was in reference to the log changes I mentioned seeing.
By the time I'd realized what I'd done ( the application I use [Webwerx] still had the info highlighted from the 'copy' function and immediately I saw Google had no reason to be included ), it was too late to edit my post....
:o
Glenn.