Forum Moderators: not2easy
I have finally created my main template for my webpage. I have a dummy column to the left for links. I notice that my bmp images take a while to load (and I am on cable) but jpg loads very fast.
The bmp images are much clearer then the jpg. So with your experience, would it be bad for my to use bmp images for a main template for those dial-up users?
Thanks.
Both are compressed formats, so they exchange some quality to reduce file size, but the compression can usually be done in a way so that the quality reduction is invisible to human detection.
Yet another option is the PNG format (portable network graphic), which was specifically designed for delivery over the Internet. See [webmasterworld.com...]
Using Save for Web saves GIFs, PNGs and JPEGs.
Saves JPEGs as JFIF which 'strips' all the information from the JPEG that are not standardized for web and readable by browsers, and has far better compression control over standard Save As... function. New Adobe CS supports JPEG 2000.
There are a several tools on the market which support selective compression - you apply different compression ratio to various parts of an image which is very good, especially if you have some time to spend selecting and compressing.
See ex. Xat JPEG Optimizer, it provides good results.
See [dcs.ed.ac.uk...]
for a good JFIF definition.
When going to a website and trying to save pictures, it is only letting me save them as Bitmap format. There is probably a setting somewhere but I can't find it.
It has only recently started doing this and it has happen on 2 different computers. With 2 different operating systems. (ME, XP)
Any thoughts!