Forum Moderators: open
I think that Yahoo is realizing that good sites exist that dont make enough revenue to afford a listing. My feeling is that they are dfinately trying to improve their database for some reason.
you can just feel things changing slightly/lately for some reason.
1. Site must contain useful, but not really commercial information. (Forget it if your site is all about selling a service or product.)
2. The site submission must be drafted in such a way that it requires very little effort for them to submit it.
I don't know if this applies to UK, but that is what happened with the Yahoo.
I submitted a non-commercial site (in profile) to Yahoo about a month ago. The category that I submitted it to (reactive attachment disorder) has only eight listed sites, half of them without descriptions and, since my livelihood does not depend upon this site being listed in Yahoo, I submitted it via free submission, deciding that, while I can't afford the paid submission cost, I can afford to wait for someone to get to it.
But now I'm wondering, does anyone at Yahoo ever go there?
Now for DMOZ and their PR9 equivalent .....
I think it's right that Yahoo accepts some free submissions. 5 or more years ago Yahoo was only the cornerstone because it was a portal to all the free stuff :)
One of my most high profile sites just got added - and I didn't submit it to Yahoo or any regional variant. It just appeared.
This obviously suggests that at least one editor is pro-actively seeking quality sites. This one is commercial, but does have quite a lot of useful (free) information on it, which is actually my usual style (I try to make the sites valuable with sellables as an extra).
The one thing it does do is make the search returns much more similar to Google. The site was #2 for its key search term and is now #2 on Yahoo as well. The sites surrounding it are pretty much the same as well.
The other question is why? September is looming (judgement day - FAST/Google/Ink) and I suggest that there could be linkage here. I've not got my head around it yet though regarding theories.
The category only had a handful of sites and I wondered at the time if the site was accepted because the category gained by having the extra entry.
Just a thought.... no factual evidence to offer.