Forum Moderators: open
An example is "baseball" search. A news story from May 13, 2002, just a short 3 days ago now costs $2.50 to view the story.
I believe this tactic may dry up alot of traffic to e-newspapers as people may balk at paying $2.50 to view the a 400 word story.
What do you think?
Wouldn't just be more cost effective to get an electronic subscription from NYT and just cut Yah** and the $2.50 charge out of the loop.
As far as business model goes:
Why $2.50 per article? Just seems too high for the masses. Perhaps, $0.50 seems more reasonable to test the waters.
I've seen this misguided approach before-- essentially, Yahoo is trying to increase revenue by offering a worse product. Google could do much better IMO.
Also, Brett noticed the redirect to Northern Light news ads here:
[webmasterworld.com...]
Looks like Yahoo is partnering with NL, probably a revenue sharing idea (thanks to DrCool for pointing that out)