Forum Moderators: open
So say for example I have a site ranking well in Yahoo but it doesn't use sitematch but just the free submission. Couldn't a competitor pay to get my homepage in Yahoo with sitematch and then stop payments after a year. This could well lead to the site getting banned from Yahoo.
Tell me if I am way off left field here, but isn't this possible?
I know representatives of the search engines will say no chance. But I know plenty of other webmasters who have used paid inclusion, stopped after 1 or 2 years and never got back in that search engines results.
and yes competitors did do it to each other all the time... well in one of my industries anyway, they even signed GB’s with other peoples URL’s and 301 banned sites on each other….alls fair in love and war ;)
I’m sure Tim posted something about this when sitematch was first launched!
DaveN
I am shocked at such tactics. Who would do such a thing! ;-)
With Overture Site Match, things are slightly different.
If you are in the index and wish to take advantage of the 48 hour refresh (for example), so you sign up for OSM.
After a set period of time, you no longer wish to participate (for whatever reason), your site will return to the status it had prior to participating in OSM.
However, your ranking pre and post OSM may not be the same, if the index has gone through an update (pages added or removed) or an algo change.
Cheers
Warren