Forum Moderators: open
This is pretty odd and serious. Serious because if I really want to be #1 (and didn't know that I was already) I would raise my bid and so would the other person that is incorrectly stated as #1...rising the overall CPC price.
My point is that this flaw in their system could cause me to raise prices and they would make more $$$$. Has anyone else experienced this? Where the DTC said you were 1 position but when you searched you were something different.
They haven't fully integrated Local into the DTC yet to show bids, but those results are intermingled in some searches, based on geographic areas.
Local results are not shown in the 'view bids' page, you must do a search on Yahoo or a partner showing these ads.
Noope. This pertains to a regular search on Yahoo.com for
a fairly highly traffic keyword. It makes no sense why this is happening, and to only a handful of terms.
I really don't care that the DTC says that I am 2nd, when I know I am 1st.
Overture has done the math on this behind boardroom doors and knows allowing this ghost bidding will make them $$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$. Someone needs to do thing about this.
Enough complaints to the Attorney General's office though
should at least get Overture and Google on their 'radar'.
BOSTONSEO: When you call your platinum rep. their prepared response will be "We don't tell you what to bid"---that is if they have handled this problem before. We had to "train" our rep to understand this problem and when they took it to their supervisor, this is the answer the top brass sent back.
If click fraud doesn't get them, this will.
yes it would take $$$$ to take legal action. but if you can prove how much $$$$ ov's actions are costing you, it might be worth it in the long run. i'm definitely going to start keeping track of this and going to consider running this by one of our lawyers.
Hmm that is interesting.. It also explains a few things.
There are a few keywords we use that have 2-3 very high bids, so we just bid in for like 5th place, yet from the reports I see that our average position is around 2.3 or so, and we get a fair amount of clicks from them. For one key phrase we are supposedly #9, yet our average position shows as 4.5.
It appears that this is more common than I suspected...
I will have to try something just for grins, and set about 30 KW to a very low bid and see how many times it actually shows up and how many clicks. If I still get a fair amount of clicks at say .12 when the high bid is $2, then there is something fishy...
I agree that Overture is benefiting from this but only if you let them by outbidding the ghost bidder. Even if you decide to outbid them it is not that considerable. Also your theory about Overture profiting from hundreds of inflated clicks make me wonder if even if you read my above post.
Let me refresh you a little about my last post. You only pay $0.01 more than the ghost bidder if he shows up in the search results. You should notice that the ghost bidder hardly ever shows up at all hence the name "Ghost Bidder." So only the very limited number of times the Ghost Bidder shows up in the search results do you pay $0.01 above his inflated bid.
Your theory was "For every click from 1st, 2nd, 3rd and 4th place Overture is reaping an additional 1.10 or more per click. Let's say 1st place gets 500 clicks, 2nd place gets 400 clicks, 3rd place gets 300 clicks, and 4th place gets 200 clicks. That's an extra $1500.00 in Overture's pockets in one day from just one key word! Now multiply that out times how many key words Overture deals with and the numbers are staggering."
So in theory if yourself and your competitors were smart you wouldn't bother outbidding him and allow him to catch a few random inflated clicks and let him run his limited budget dry. Instead everyone got territorial and outbid him thus making your extra $1,500 a day theory correct.
You can argue it 2 ways. If these ghost bidders were not allowed then you would never be in this mess or like every other day in the online marketplace you need to adapt to these changes.
WLAUZON seems as if he is playing his cards right. You might be use to bidding in 1st but you need to be disciplined enought to bid in second or third behind the ghost bidders knowing you are still receiving that 1st place traffic.
We lowered our bidding position (normally we need 1st or 2nd place to get any business) We bid one penny above the ghost bidder for one day. The Ghost bidder was in 5th place and we were in 4th place. The ghost bidder was almost a dollar above the bid directly below it:
#1 Bid = $1.75
#2 Bid = $1.74
#3 Bid = $1.73
#4 Bid = $1.72 (our position)
#5 Bid = $1.71 (Ghost bidder)
#5 Bid = $0.60
We knew if what overture said was true, our average cost per click for this day would be close to 60 cents as long as the bidding didn't change much--and especially since we believe our ghost bidder only get 15 minutes a day online. If Overture wasn't telling the truth, then our average would be $1.72. It turns our the average ended up close to 60 cents.
STILL.... all the people above us paid over $1.71 and didn't need to pay this much. So the problem lies in the people who are above the person above the ghost bidder. I would love to sit all day in 5th place at 61 cents, but I wouldn't get much business---we've tried that already. We typically prefer to be in 1st, 2nd, and 3rd place so we are currently averaging $1.72 to be in those positions because our competitors don't understand the ghost bidding issue. Frankly, I don't want to tell them about it either because they are the type of competitors to use this as a weapon to drain our budget even more. I might have been wrong about paying a penny above the ghost bid, but I AM NOT WRONG THAT GHOST BIDDERS DRIVE UP THE BIDDING. Typically the keyword we are bidding on goes for less than it is now going for. I AM NOT WRONG THAT THIS IS UNETHICAL. Overture's response is "we don't tell you what to bid". Then why do they show this ghost bidder on the bid tools and make us all think he is active?
This forum exist for the purpose of helping fellow Web Professionals and not for finger pointing. As only a less than a week member you have a lot to learn.
Also if you took the time to check out some of JMEZ's other threads it wouldnt be hard to figure out that he or she doesnt work for Overture.
Also, I don't have time to check all 300 keywords I bid on and reseach who else are ghost bidders. If the bidder isn't online, they shouldn't be showing up as a bidder on the bid tools!
Doesn't anyone else get this? I'm not the bad guy (girl) here!
I also see the potential here for ghost bids to eventually become grossly abused by PPC players solely in order to drive up costs for everyone. This could be a real problem if someone is bidding two sites on the same keyword in order to jam competitors, but that never happens, does it. :)
An easy fix for Overture to make would be to highlight (blue, bold, underline, whatever) bids in the Overture interface for keywords where there is a daily budget set. At least then we could easily identify these ghost bids without having to go out and constantly search them.
Also, I'm sensing a somewhat antagonist attraction developing between Kgirl and Jmez. I wonder if there are any stickies?