Forum Moderators: open
New Bidding Feature
In late June, we'll offer a new bidding option that will save you time and optimize your budget. This new feature, Auto Bidding, will ensure that you never pay more than 1 cent above the next highest competitor's bid. Look for the new Auto Bidding feature in the Manage Listings section of the DirecTraffic Center®. To see a preview of this new bidding feature, go to [preview.overture.com....]
Auto-Bidding will not guarantee position. The functionality works similar to Google AdWords Select, except in the fact that the "Max Bid" Amount will be displayed.
This will not affect third party Bid Management Tools, and actually will make them more effective. Because advertisers using third party tools will not be using the "Auto Bid" function at Overture, their bids will be adjusted on a "case by case" scenario. This in effect means, that their "Maximum" bid amount is "Hidden" from the other advertisers, and therefore more effective.
If the auto bid feature in AdWords is something that gave it a separate identity from Overture's system, it'll be interesting to see if Google moves on this.
I don't see how this benefits Third Party Bid Management Tools (BMT) at all. Thus, if I use Overture's system and enter in a high number, my bid will always be updated, and I can tell how high the other person's bid is, because I will be a penny higher. And, the BMTs are limited as to how many times they can update in one day-- I'm sure Overture's is not. Maybe I'm missing something. Please explain.
As far as the lawsuit is concerned, I don't think they have much to worry about. There is another, small PPC that has been using "proxy bidding" for at least a year. Maybe they could sue both Google and Overture. :)
Maybe this example help you understand why Overture's Autobidder will not work as well as a 3rd party tool.
Advertiser A - Set's Auto-bid Max at $1.00
Advertiser B - Set's Auto-bid Max at $.50
Advertiser C - Set's Auto-Bid Max at $.25
Then, Advertiser B increases Auto-bid Max to $.99, because he can see that "A" is at $1.00 and "C" is at $.25.
So, Advertiser A Pays $1.00 CPC, B ONLY Pays $.26 CPC, and C pays a maximum of $.25...
Unless Advertiser A decreases his Auto-Bid Max to $.98, he is overypaying $.74 a click, because he will pay $1.00 while Advertiser B is only paying $.26..
With flat bidding and using a third party tool (Especially one w/ some ROI functionality), Advertiser A would not be over paying $.74, because the third party tool, would adjust the bid downward until Advertiser B had the bid gap..
IMO the added functionality will create "mass" confusion for "end advertisers", and necessitate the need for consultants and 3rd party providers even more.
I used a simple example above, all three advertisers using Overture's Auto-Bid function. But what happens to the "mix" when one of the top 3 advertisers is using a "flat" bid for the keyword, or two of the top 3 are using "flat" bid.. You can see where I'm going.. Unless Overture "clearly" indicates in the SERPS which bids are "Auto-Bid", and which are "Flat Bid", it will be a nightmare for an advertiser to keep up with the bid management process.
One poster said, I'll just boost my max bid so high that I won't have to worry about it.. That's fine until #2 decides to boost their max bid to $.01 under you. Then you are paying that high bid ceiling, until you go check your bids manually. And #2 is only paying $.01 above #3's maximum bid...
IMO Overture needs to either stay with a 100% flat bid system (as now), or move 100% to a Google like max cap system. A mix of both could possibly be deadly to an advertiser's budget.
In other words, who is Overture looking out for when they designed this tool: themselves or the customer?
If they looked out for themselves, they would up the bids towards the max (parallel to your example):
Advertiser A: Max bid= $1.00 -> $0.51
Advertiser B: Max bid= $0.50 -> $0.50
Advertiser C: Max bid= $0.25 -> depends on what the rest are. If the next one is $0.05, then this should be $0.06. If the next one is static at $0.24, then bid would be $0.25.
If they looked out for the customer:
Advertiser A: Max bid= $1.00 -> $0.08
Advertiser B: Max bid= $0.50 -> $0.07
Advertiser C: Max bid= $0.25 -> If next bid is $0.05, then $0.06. If the next bid is higher, then all of the ones above it will be higher.
In example #1, I agree, there would be a need for BMTs; in example #2, I could see there could be some collusion going on among bidders.
Am I making sense, or am I off? Also, the BMT can only change the bid 6 times a day.
Does anyone know how Google's AdWords Select works (i.e., collapse bids on the upper, or lower, range)? It may be different because it requires a minimum bid for some terms.
I have concerns over alot of Auto tools......isnt this the same type of thing that caused a major slide on the DOW several years back....the market slipped a bit and triggered off everyones auto buy/sells into a massive frenzy that was pre programmed and out of everyones control until the smoke settled.
If 5 people settled for top place on auto on a 10 cent bid.....it could double (100 %)in a day.
Wont seem extreme for people on a $3.00 bid already.
Or am I getting the wrong end of the stick?
Cheers from the Outback
I too, am concerned with GOverture's new Auto-bid tool. I must agree with redzone, that the added functionality will create mass confusion. I deal with Goverture and a 3rd party bidding service on a daily basis and they confuse me all the time:). With the many "bid changing options" available through 3rd party services pertaining to time of bid changes, frequency, max price, bid gap strategies etc. I find it near impossible to keep up with who's doing what, as I find myself more concerned with the bid wars that get out of hand. For instance, what about the "mix" that redzone mentioned?
Advertiser A - Set's Auto-bid Max at $1.00
Advertiser B - Set's Flat-bid Max at $.50
Advertiser C - Set's Auto-Bid Max at $.25
Assuming these are the only competitors for the bid, then C would be paying $0.05, B $0.50, and A $0.51. Makes a nice juicy bid gap for GOverture. This happens all the time now, even when using 3rd party management. The top two guys will duke it out, each stepping over the other, while position 3 sits there at $0.05!
If this new bid tool really worked the way it should then the bidding should start at their minimum ($0.05) and increase one cent for each postion above that. Then, there would never be a bid gap. If "Joe" and I want to compete for placement on a word and he sets his max at $1.00, and I set mine at $0.50, we should still only pay $0.06 and $0.05 respectively. Does that sound totally ridiculous to you guys?
I am not yet ready to give up my 3rd party management until I see proof of the new GOverture tool.
Also, the BMT can only change the bid 6 times a day.
I received word yesterday that the 6 bid change rule has been lifted from some of the approved bid management services. The service I use is now allowed to change bids 24 times a day, a minimum of 30 minutes apart.
[edited by: Brett_Tabke at 5:23 am (utc) on June 26, 2002]
[edit reason] fixed url [/edit]
At the top left of the "manage listings" box, you'll see a checkmark symbol. Clicking that symbol selects all the listings. Then click on the "Bid Options" box (you'll find one at the top and bottom of the listings). From there you can select the "convert all to auto bidding" option.
All the listings you have checked (which will be all of the listings in this case) will be updated to auto bidding.
Result? They are now paying $.21 & $.20 while my cost is $.05 to be #3. Big gap, mucho dinero for Overture. Before autobid, they would have paid $.07 & $.06 to be on top of me.
Who wins with autobid? At least I have the satisfaction of making my competitors spend more (is that Christian?). Great scam for Overture!
Did anyone else experience this as well? Any thoughts? I have emailed Apex a couple of times but I am still awaiting instructions.
Appreciate your help.
If "Joe" and I want to compete for placement on a word and he sets his max at $1.00, and I set mine at $0.50, we should still only pay $0.06 and $0.05 respectively. Does that sound totally ridiculous to you guys?
Wouldn't you get ticked? You say you're willing to pay .50 - but the software won't let you step over a mere .06 bid.
I just don't see a model that works here. Every resolution of one scenario has a flaw in another scenario. It sure makes the number one spot less appealing!