Update Saga. Part 5

[Brett_Tabke]

What say you?

Over and done with?

All done all through?

[BillyS]

The only thing I consistently see is inconsistency. Obviously they don't like what they've seen or it would have spread by now.

We're now in a state of EverUp

[DannyS]

Is anybody seeing anything different with the "Similar Pages", the related:www, results or am I imagining it.

[bigearz]

Isn't this fabulous?

Search for a film review, include the name of the site you want to see the review from and what do you get?

Heaps of links to the page in question, followed by the wrong page on the site with (finally!) the required page underneath.

Needless to say the page doesn't appear at all unless the site name is included. And our home page is PR 6/10.

Google send a standard response to enquiries about this that achieves nothing. And still the results are awful, with no recourse for us to do anything about it. If it was 1789 there'd be barricades.

Movie Review search [google.co.uk]

And yes, it is a bad film.

[edited by: tedster at 11:23 am (utc) on Nov. 10, 2005]
[edit reason] fix side scroll [/edit]

[steveb]

You might first try this
[webmasterworld.com...]

And if you want to rank for something, try putting the word on your page more than just once in alt text.

[Ankhenaton]

I think the only solution is to move spam detection client side with an adapted spamassassin kind of program that uses bayesian learning from what you feed it.

Would do it myself, but G would probably take your business pretty soon away .. so I'd rather not touch it.

Like burning your hands trying to improve Windows lol if it works Billy will grab it. ;)

[edited by: Ankhenaton at 3:37 am (utc) on Nov. 10, 2005]

[crobb305]

Helping a friend search for information on a particular drug addiction (search any prescription drug name along with the word "addiction") yielded pages of crap sites with the word "addiction" in the title, often with the word "cheap", simply selling the drug in question. Looks like its gotten a bit better with this update.

C

[newwebster]

I think google needs to get a 1.21 Gigawatt Flux Capacitor to instantly arive at the point of serp completion.

[theBear]

I'm afraid that the new zero cycle time 4 pentabyte wide Serpulator device is not yet out of the lab.

Some little problem with residual Hawking radiation and those darn pesky micro black holes.

[reseller]

Good morning Folks!

The older you get..the less sleep hours you need ... The more you enjoy life. Have any of you youngesters ever thought about that.

As such I guess Matt "Inigo" Cutts is an old man, because he only sleep few hours a day :-)

Ok. I see Jagger3 DC is still alive this morning, and the dog hasnīt eaten it yet. Canīt say the same about part-2 of Jagger Update thread.

GoogleGuy said yesterday that we are in the middle of Tha Father of All FLUX, and indeed we are.

Jagger3 results should have spread to other DCs by now, that what GG told us yesterday. Any of you have noticed significate "expansion" of J3?

Wish you all a great Jagger3 day.

[reseller]

Good morning GoogleGuy and Matt

As you might have noticed some of the folks here have sent WebSpam Team spam reports. However, the same folks don't see much action has been taken to remove spammers from Jagger3 serps in particular or default google index in general.

Of course we know that WebSpam Team has to verify and investigate spam reports before removing spam sites.

Few words from you or Matt assuring the folks that you are taking care of those spam reports, shall for sure encourage my fellow webmaster members to continue sending those spam reports.

Thanks.

P.S. any available weather report shall be highly appreciated :-)