Forum Moderators: open
Have over 30 URL's registered that forward to "primary".com domain. So, example, if you type cows.com in your browser, it autoforwards to the main site farmer.com.
On the farmer.com site, I've got over 40K static pages, that are accessible by a index, each page has links back to the 30 URL's with the specific page as the link.. Example: on the milk.htm page, it has links: farmer.com/index/milk.htm, cow.com/index/milk.htm, etc. These all go to the same milk page on farmer.com... Got the idea?
OK, now I've submitted all 30 URL's in google.com... The farmer.com site is currently being crawled at over 4,000 sessions per hour. It's been steadly doing this for 5 days. My guess is each URL is being spidered.
I wonder if all 30 URL's will show up in google? If you search on milk, you'll get farmer.com/index/milk.htm and cow.com/index/milk.htm, etc.,etc.
Has anyone ever tried this? At the current crawl rate, it'll take over 40 days to finish the crawl?
If I were at your milk.htm, saw a link for more milk info, clicked and found myself right back at milk.htm, gave benefit of doubt and clicked a second link, only to again feel like Dorothy mumbling there's no place like milk.htm, there's no place like milk.htm ... I'd never try any of the other links and your site would go into the not worth another look file. Potential SERP positioning improvement at the expense of wasting the time of your customers after they arrive seems an odd business priority, but maybe that's just me.
If I want to run around in circles chasing my own tail, I'll decide to believe in reincarnation and come back as a puppy, not roll around in circles on someone's site.
I don't know how the spiders would react, but I can't believe I'd the only consumer who would feel angry about clicking a link for more info only to find myself redirected right back at square 1.
BTW, looks like the sessions have started to slow down from over 4K per hour to 2700 per hour. When I just checked, it was averaging 188 sessions per 5 seconds, but then spiked back up to 220...
NOTE: Domain name's referenced are for example only, they are not the real ones...
LOL
<added>
>Basically, we should get 30 URL's for the same content,
>but different domain names in the engine
yeah, that's a better way to get booted. your actual way may take a bit longer allthough it's strong enough to bring you out of google after a while.
</added>
Can anyone tell us why this would be a bad idea? ...or at least why it would get you booted from Google? My thoughts are that it would not be a wise thing to do - but I do not have the experience or examples to prove it...but I am sure one of you out there has a good answer.
how are you doing the re-direct? surely google know's about most re-directs and will just end up listing the one domain?
IMHO it's going to either going to get you into trouble with the bot... or it'll just end up indexing one domain if it sees the others are effectively duplicate content.
(A word of warning though.. my previous employer who manages a 'k or so sites tried to be clever with re-directing pages to deal with different language versions... Was a legitimate thing a teckie did to save a lot of hassle, but GoogleBot saw it as cheating and 6/700 well placed sites dissapeared in one quick turn on the dancefloor.. .. seems a little dangerous to me.. )
(you could sticky me the url too :) .. 'cos I'm still not sure I quite get what you're doing..)
ATB, :)
The 30 URL's are configured at the registery service to autoforward to the primary domain, when someone type's that address in the search bar of the browser. Example: type cow.com, it forwards to farmer.com - all done by the registery service, not scripting.
all done by the registery service, not scripting.
Then I would hazard a guess that if it's a DNS redirect, which is I think what you're describing, google will deal with this, and shed the other domains? .. if it's the server doing the re-direct.. same goes IMHO..
(If it's not a silly question.. .. why are you redirecting the same page to various different domains?)
I often wonder why folks go to the time and expense to set up elaborate scenarios like this. From a usability standpoint they are horrible and I can't imagine visitors being appreciative of the hassles. I suppose there may be some short term gain to be had, but you must know the seach engines and directories hate that stuff and a major goal is to find sites like yours and remove them. Why not use your time and talents to create something useful and lasting?
For the newcomers: Submitted 30 different keyworded URLS that "DNS" forward to a primary domain to google. For the past 5 days, averaged 2K sessions by google bot on a 40K static page primary site. Each individual page of the 40K, link back to each of the 30 different URL's. Each "static" page has the keywords of the URL links in metatags, page content, etc - optimized for the search engines... Have tested same scenario with 2 URLS pointing to one site, and have maintained google ranking for 5 months. Now goes the test on 30 URLS and 40K page site.
If it doesn't then surely it's going to notice 30 x 40,000 duplicated pages? If the 30 duplications were something harmless like copies of the Apache documentation I'm sure it would just ignore it and give you the benefit of the doubt... but given that all 30 copies are on the same IP I would think they'll just stop GoogleBot going to your server at all..
I don't know.. doesn't seem quite fair to poor GB to me ;) sending him round in circles like that.. .. besides.. if it works your going to end up with 30 identical links in the search results.. someone will be sure to point this out too G.?
Oh well.. do let us all know how it goes next dance..
ATB ..
538759438 3:44:20 PM 216.239.46.167
Referer: Direct Request
Browser: Googlebot/2.1 (+http://www.googlebot.com/bot.html)
Entry Page: /farmer/cow.htm
538759439 3:44:23 PM 216.239.46.193
Referer: Direct Request
Browser: Googlebot/2.1 (+http://www.googlebot.com/bot.html)
Entry Page: /farmer/cow2.htm
538759441 3:44:28 PM 216.239.46.23
Referer: Direct Request
Browser: Googlebot/2.1 (+http://www.googlebot.com/bot.html)
Entry Page: /farmer/ cow3.htm
538759442 3:44:28 PM 216.239.46.23
Referer: Direct Request
Browser: Googlebot/2.1 (+http://www.googlebot.com/bot.html)
Entry Page: /farmer/ cow4.htm
538759440 3:44:28 PM 216.239.46.23
Referer: Direct Request
Browser: Googlebot/2.1 (+http://www.googlebot.com/bot.html)
Entry Page: /farmer/ cow5.htm
538759443 3:44:28 PM 216.239.46.23
Referer: Direct Request
Browser: Googlebot/2.1 (+http://www.googlebot.com/bot.html)
Entry Page: /farmer/ cow6.htm
538759444 3:44:29 PM 216.239.46.193
Referer: Direct Request
Browser: Googlebot/2.1 (+http://www.googlebot.com/bot.html)
Entry Page: /farmer/ cow7.htm
538759445 3:44:30 PM 216.239.46.193
Referer: Direct Request
Browser: Googlebot/2.1 (+http://www.googlebot.com/bot.html)
Entry Page: /farmer/ cow8.htm
Any ideas why?